Page 5 of 107 FirstFirst ... 345671555105 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 1064
Discuss RIP TA at the Reports & Promotion forum within the The Army Rumour Service website; YOU MEAN I CAN'T WHINGE ON ARRSE ANYMORE !!!!!!! HEH, I WAS ONLY DOING A ...
  1. #41
    Senior Member polar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    9,099

    Re: RIP TA

    YOU MEAN I CAN'T WHINGE ON ARRSE ANYMORE !!!!!!! HEH, I WAS ONLY DOING A TEMP BREAK FROM WHINGING NOT A PERMANENT ONE....

    AT LEAST GIVE MSR ONE LAST CHANCE TO MODUR8 DA 4UM ONF MOR

  2. #42
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    258

    Re: RIP TA

    The MOD comment is disengenuous to say the least. It implies that operational spending will be unaffected ergo the rest of the spending is non-operational therefore non-essential. This suggests you have a TA where you only train for operations, presumably a matter of months before you go. All the other time (four years) you are not paid and do no training.

    My view is that if the above is true it will be the end of the TA. Who would join? Or have I missed something.

  3. #43
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    2,097

    Re: RIP TA

    If these measures are neccessary then really the money should be coming from elsewhere within the military... the stuff thats really froth, Kings Troop, Public duties, Horse of the year show, possibly Adventerous Training.

    I think closing down operational units for 6 months is folly, because many of them wont reopen.

    trotsky

  4. #44
    Senior Member stapd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    268

    Re: RIP TA

    Quote Originally Posted by Trotsky
    If these measures are neccessary then really the money should be coming from elsewhere within the military... the stuff thats really froth, Kings Troop, Public duties, Horse of the year show, possibly Adventerous Training.

    I think closing down operational units for 6 months is folly, because many of them wont reopen.

    trotsky
    Indeed, I fear you are not too far wrong... I fear I'm starting to feel a bit tinfoil hat on this, but there's been a few people on here forecasting a scorched earth policy from the current shower before they get forceably ejected from power.

    I guess this is very very breaking news, but I'm surprised no-one else has picked up on this.

    I really can't see how even the smarmiest tw@ PR type in MoD could say with a sincere face that this wouldn't have a crushing impact.
    stapd - 'st-ay-ped'

  5. #45
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    258

    Re: RIP TA

    Trotsky
    That is what seems curious. The inefficiency and slack budgeting in the regular system makes me a little vexed that the first slash is in the MTD budget.

    ET

  6. #46
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    9

    Re: RIP TA

    Quote Originally Posted by extrader
    My view is that if the above is true it will be the end of the TA.
    I totally agree. This is dangerous territory. Without the TA how is the Army going to function effectively? How many NRPS, FTRS mobilised soldiers are working in this 'one army' now? And when that dries up? what then? Army medical services??? Are they not massively buoyed up by TA medic units? The end line is the army without the TA will struggle massively. I could go on...

    This government is a disgrace. They are only seeing a foot infront of them. How do they expect TA regiments to surrvive this? 6 months is a good as the chop. If the hierachy of a regiment start dropping out due to loss of interest then a regiment is as good as dead. In 6 months a regiment will have no new recruits, people with stalled careers and faces like a bulldog likcing p*** off a nettle.

    I hope the media tear into this and into the government!

  7. #47
    Senior Member Blyth_spirit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    802

    Re: RIP TA

    They will already be preparing the 'priority to the front line' argument and hoping that the press will buy it and not look deeper at the implications. Hopefully, as the TA are not a hot media topic (because they don't fight in Afghanistan do they?) this whole thing will blow over in a matter of days and the government can go back to the important business of clinging to power.

    In the mean time we will be expected to retain soldiers, the vast majority of who have, are or will contribute to ops, who have had career progression halted and a useful income stream dried up and who, suddenly, have a lot of free time on their hands to start doing something else.

    Barking.
    "Leave the Artillerymen alone, they are an obstinate lot..." - Napoleon

  8. #48
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    258

    Re: RIP TA

    Well I hate to be even by inference defending this intellectually, morally and ethically bankrupt so-called executive, and agree they are responsible for the overall lack of funding HOWEVER....
    I wish I could be convinced that the regular element have not run for cover and slashed the MTD budget as an easy fix that does not affect them.
    The amount of MTD money is actually small compared to the salary bill; I know savings cannot be taken in year, but why are we 25(!!) brigadiers and 75(!!) full colonels OVER establishment. Taking that by my calculation would generate over £15-20 million pa 10/11 and beyond. A lot of MTDS!

  9. #49
    Senior Member fusilier50's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    619

    Re: RIP TA

    cant see any of this mentioned in the review earlier this year but can any of us be truly surprised by what these maniacs do in their party's death throws

    Mr Ainsworth said to the House:

    "Reservist training will be refocused with a greater emphasis on preparation to support current operations. Initial training will be restructured so that new recruits receive sufficient military skills to participate in their units' collective training within six months of joining, and are fully trained and eligible for mobilisation within three years. Routine training will also be reviewed and sufficient training days allocated to ensure annual military competency standards can be achieved by all.
    Strategic Review of the UK's Reserve Forces
    "Si vis pacem, para bellum"

  10. #50
    Junior Member out_in_the_open's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    29

    Re: RIP TA

    Quote Originally Posted by holl5080
    Quote Originally Posted by extrader
    My view is that if the above is true it will be the end of the TA.
    I totally agree. This is dangerous territory. Without the TA how is the Army going to function effectively? How many NRPS, FTRS mobilised soldiers are working in this 'one army' now? And when that dries up? what then? Army medical services??? Are they not massively buoyed up by TA medic units? The end line is the army without the TA will struggle massively. I could go on...
    A quick lesson: the Operational Peacekeeping Fund (what was CPF) pays for anything attributable to ops. Therefore any training as prep for ops is paid by the Reserve.

    The Army is 600 Majs over establishment so watch out the FTRS - they'll be wasted out sooner rather than later. the manning levels are under immense scrutiny.

    The TA is on tretcherous ground. For value-added they are not cost effective with the best units mobilising circa 12% of the establishment year on year. Its a case of Regs or TA going and its fairly clear where the pain will be laid.

    Quite frankly some of the old and bold need culling to bring down the salary overheads and then there may be some money for the 'worker bees'.

Page 5 of 107 FirstFirst ... 345671555105 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •