- 20-06-2012, 20:31 #351Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Posts
- 622
Midnight
The Scots DG were formed from Scots Greys & 3rd Carabineers, who were as English as "Cheshire" cheese, so your objections to QDG and 9/12L merging as "The Royal Welsh Cavalry" (Dragoon Guards & Royal Lancers) is defeated by historical presedence. With both regiments on CVR/T and both in Germany this merger makes sense on an administrative level as well.
As for 2 scottish Regiments? 1 RTR is only Scottish in the WO's & Sgt's mess, the numbers of "jocks" below SNCO level is minute. Also the merger of 1&2 RTR is widely seen as a done deal.
Plus regiments can change recruiting area's in an instant. The battle of Rorkes Drift highlighted in the film "Zulu" was fought by an English regiment, the 24th Regiment of Foot (2nd Warwickshire Regiment). They were only re-titled "South Wales Borderers" and became a Welsh regiment 3 years after the battle.
sorry old chap, your argument has got more holes than a cullender!
Wales can have still have an RAC Regiment, it does not have to be QDG.Last edited by aghart; 20-06-2012 at 20:49.
The very last 1 RTR Gunnery Instructor at JLR RAC
- 20-06-2012, 20:38 #352
Yep. Please sir don't cut my regiment cut this regiment. Look, they've AGAIed four more people that us this year.
Don't cut all our tanks sir, look the RN can easily do without twelve T45s. They could have six and still get by according to this study.
Don't cut all our T45s sir, the Army can easily do without all their tanks. They could get by with 150, look at this study.
Awesome, cheers lads. We'll cut six T45s and 200 tanks then.
- 20-06-2012, 20:41 #353Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Posts
- 23,801
I'm pretty keen on the idea of homebased, homegrown and home trained regional Units... (a brigaded capbadge makes this VERY easy, with existing Phase 2 est used for... phase 2 for all these capbadges).
However, a few of the old and bold at my location have highlighted a beleif it would actually create G1 issues. Specifically more AWOL.
IMHO it would make it easier... Jones has gone AWOL, where does he live, 30 mins down the road, off we go i nthe guard rover.
What do you think? More AWOL or less, my arguement is that with local units then home problems are not miles away and magnified by remoteness.
- 20-06-2012, 20:58 #354Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Posts
- 622
A real danger of people joining the army simply to get a local job, then you will have problems with people when 6 months tours come up, even a couple of weeks on excercise on SPTA. AWOL will be a problem.
We need people who want to be a soldier, put the non soldiers in their home area and you will get problems I fear.The very last 1 RTR Gunnery Instructor at JLR RAC
- 20-06-2012, 21:07 #355Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Posts
- 23,801
You don't think that such fruits would be weeded out by the phase 1 and 2 training then? Local soldiers would buy local houses... have local mortgages and local girlfriends... and local stigma if they acted the cnut.
- 20-06-2012, 21:16 #356
Who the fuck joins the Army to live 25 minutes down the road?
- 20-06-2012, 21:17 #357
[QUOTE=jimmys_best_mate;4469043]Who the fuck joins the Army to live 25 minutes down the road?[/QUOTE
Especially in Wales!
- 20-06-2012, 21:50 #358
I understand your concern, but you are wrong.
The first concern is to be sure that the the Army has an ORBAT fit for purpose. Creating/maintaining jobs for Wales (or anywhere else, for that matter) is a secondary consideration, and then only as a constraint, not as an aim.
Likewise, demanding that the 'new' ORBAT be designed with due deference to Regimental feeling (all that 'Golden Thread' bollocks that is so blindingly obvious that no two senior officers have ever managed to explain it in the same way, let alone using concrete terms that a sympathetic civvy - let alone a hostile one - might actually grasp) is a constraint, not a goal.
The Regimental identities we are s'posed to weep over, have been trashed time and time again in my short lifetime to date.
The Georgians didn't fuss half as much.
If you needed a Battalion, you got some punters to tender for the contract, and when you didn't need the resource - you chopped lumps off the Army.
The Cardwell reforms that created the Regimental millstone did so unintentionally: the aim was to systematise and make more consistent, the system to meet the demand of Regiments for new blood with a supply thereof.
We're on the verge of having an Army of record-breaking smallness.
If it's going to be f#cking small, it needs to be f#cking good.
So that means your system for supplying manpower should look not to meeting regional quotas, let alone to the sustaining of evaporated Regimental identities - least of all those which (however ancient) do not have a latter-day track record of measurable excellence.
Frankly, faced with a choice of good units, or 'historic' units, as a taxpayer, I want good ones. If they happen to be historic, it's a minor fringe benefit to be exploited (for tourist revenue?) but being 'historic' is as likely to breed inflexibility and incompetence as it is to engender excellence.Summer grasses - all that is left of the dreams of soldiers
- 20-06-2012, 21:59 #359Emsdorf and Victory!
Drive me closer!
I want to hit them with my sword!
(The avatar works better if you can read the bottom line. See gallery:
http://www.arrse.co.uk/members/alien...me-closer.html )
- 20-06-2012, 22:02 #360
I couldn't possibly comment on the possible binning/amalgamations of RAC regiments, however the thought of a ''Welsh divison/brigade'' is really just a silly idea. The last time my unit were based in the same area as we recruited we had more G1 issues with soldiers going AWOL/CDT etc than when we were based in Germany. Basically it's all romantic bollox. You join up to get away from home (I did) .Any way does anyone know when the report of who is for the chop is out ?
Just keeping myself to myself !




108Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




Reply With Quote









Bookmarks