Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

Join ARRSE (free) to join in and remove this advertising

Page 36 of 61 FirstFirst ... 26343536373846 ... LastLast
Like Tree108Likes
Discuss Regimental Proectionism at it's worst or at it's best? in RAC on The Army Rumour Service; Originally Posted by midnight @Chocolate-frog So Scotland gets 2 RAC Regts the same as the Irish with 2 RAC Regiments,so thatīs 8 for England and the Welsh who supply nearly 9% of the British Army ...
  1. #351
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    622
    Quote Originally Posted by midnight View Post
    @Chocolate-frog

    So Scotland gets 2 RAC Regts the same as the Irish with 2 RAC Regiments,so thatīs 8 for England and the Welsh who supply nearly 9% of the British Army get fcuked off with no RAC Regt?That map is a God send for all those in QDG fighting to stay Welsh!

    PS. there are 9 Fijians in QDG according to Taff-Cav and to accomodate those they had to sacrifice 9 welsh lads to other Regts,so recruiting in Wales is very strong,no doubt because thereīs not many other jobs around and losing more is not going to please a Country already pissed off with being the first in line for factory closures.

    Midnight
    The Scots DG were formed from Scots Greys & 3rd Carabineers, who were as English as "Cheshire" cheese, so your objections to QDG and 9/12L merging as "The Royal Welsh Cavalry" (Dragoon Guards & Royal Lancers) is defeated by historical presedence. With both regiments on CVR/T and both in Germany this merger makes sense on an administrative level as well.

    As for 2 scottish Regiments? 1 RTR is only Scottish in the WO's & Sgt's mess, the numbers of "jocks" below SNCO level is minute. Also the merger of 1&2 RTR is widely seen as a done deal.

    Plus regiments can change recruiting area's in an instant. The battle of Rorkes Drift highlighted in the film "Zulu" was fought by an English regiment, the 24th Regiment of Foot (2nd Warwickshire Regiment). They were only re-titled "South Wales Borderers" and became a Welsh regiment 3 years after the battle.
    sorry old chap, your argument has got more holes than a cullender!

    Wales can have still have an RAC Regiment, it does not have to be QDG.
    Last edited by aghart; 20-06-2012 at 20:49.
    soprano54 likes this.
    The very last 1 RTR Gunnery Instructor at JLR RAC

  2. #352
    Senior Member jimmys_best_mate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    11,687
    Quote Originally Posted by Bubbles_Barker View Post
    I'm not sure that popcorn production can keep up with the audience requirements of watching the self flagellation of the Cavalry. We do make it so easy for the politicians don't we?
    Yep. Please sir don't cut my regiment cut this regiment. Look, they've AGAIed four more people that us this year.

    Don't cut all our tanks sir, look the RN can easily do without twelve T45s. They could have six and still get by according to this study.

    Don't cut all our T45s sir, the Army can easily do without all their tanks. They could get by with 150, look at this study.

    Awesome, cheers lads. We'll cut six T45s and 200 tanks then.
    techno-spastic likes this.

  3. #353
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    23,801
    Quote Originally Posted by midnight View Post
    Yes and thatīs why a few forward thinking people want not to only save QDG but all the local Regiments to have such a Division in Wales where unemployment is high,thereīs already a huge presence there and more soldiers stationed there in their home areas would be a stabilising factor.The training and range facilities for the RAC are already there as are those for the Infantry,with BAOR closing it only makes sense to keep the soldiers in areas near their homes to provide stability as the job becomes harder with fewer combat soldiers available,itīs becoming a very thin red line in the next few years.
    Do the same with the North of England and Scotland and jobs linked to the new Divisions will soon spring up,the same goes for Southern England around Bovington where employment is anything but rosey.
    Do thousands of soldiers really need to be stationed in London where rents and the cost of living are so high?
    I'm pretty keen on the idea of homebased, homegrown and home trained regional Units... (a brigaded capbadge makes this VERY easy, with existing Phase 2 est used for... phase 2 for all these capbadges).

    However, a few of the old and bold at my location have highlighted a beleif it would actually create G1 issues. Specifically more AWOL.

    IMHO it would make it easier... Jones has gone AWOL, where does he live, 30 mins down the road, off we go i nthe guard rover.

    What do you think? More AWOL or less, my arguement is that with local units then home problems are not miles away and magnified by remoteness.

  4. #354
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    622
    Quote Originally Posted by chocolate_frog View Post
    I'm pretty keen on the idea of homebased, homegrown and home trained regional Units... (a brigaded capbadge makes this VERY easy, with existing Phase 2 est used for... phase 2 for all these capbadges).

    However, a few of the old and bold at my location have highlighted a beleif it would actually create G1 issues. Specifically more AWOL.

    IMHO it would make it easier... Jones has gone AWOL, where does he live, 30 mins down the road, off we go i nthe guard rover.

    What do you think? More AWOL or less, my arguement is that with local units then home problems are not miles away and magnified by remoteness.


    A real danger of people joining the army simply to get a local job, then you will have problems with people when 6 months tours come up, even a couple of weeks on excercise on SPTA. AWOL will be a problem.

    We need people who want to be a soldier, put the non soldiers in their home area and you will get problems I fear.
    The very last 1 RTR Gunnery Instructor at JLR RAC

  5. #355
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    23,801
    You don't think that such fruits would be weeded out by the phase 1 and 2 training then? Local soldiers would buy local houses... have local mortgages and local girlfriends... and local stigma if they acted the cnut.

  6. #356
    Senior Member jimmys_best_mate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    11,687
    Who the fuck joins the Army to live 25 minutes down the road?
    techno-spastic likes this.

  7. #357
    Member three3alpha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    98
    [QUOTE=jimmys_best_mate;4469043]Who the fuck joins the Army to live 25 minutes down the road?[/QUOTE

    Especially in Wales!
    jimmys_best_mate likes this.

  8. #358
    Senior Member Stonker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    17,936
    Images
    7
    Quote Originally Posted by midnight View Post
    [snip]The saving of QDG is not about the RAC per se,Itīs about keeping a Welsh Regiment in Wales and the jobs there intact,the amalgamation of the 15/19th and the 13/18th worked because they both recruited in the North of England,there is no other Welsh Regiment to join up with,9/12th are POW `Ownī and have the 3 feathers as a coincidence, theyīre about as much Welsh as the 4 RTR were!If it was about capbadges QDG might like to join the European Army with the Austrians except that the Hapsburg Eagle would be banned there!
    I understand your concern, but you are wrong.

    The first concern is to be sure that the the Army has an ORBAT fit for purpose. Creating/maintaining jobs for Wales (or anywhere else, for that matter) is a secondary consideration, and then only as a constraint, not as an aim.

    Likewise, demanding that the 'new' ORBAT be designed with due deference to Regimental feeling (all that 'Golden Thread' bollocks that is so blindingly obvious that no two senior officers have ever managed to explain it in the same way, let alone using concrete terms that a sympathetic civvy - let alone a hostile one - might actually grasp) is a constraint, not a goal.

    The Regimental identities we are s'posed to weep over, have been trashed time and time again in my short lifetime to date.

    The Georgians didn't fuss half as much.

    If you needed a Battalion, you got some punters to tender for the contract, and when you didn't need the resource - you chopped lumps off the Army.

    The Cardwell reforms that created the Regimental millstone did so unintentionally: the aim was to systematise and make more consistent, the system to meet the demand of Regiments for new blood with a supply thereof.

    We're on the verge of having an Army of record-breaking smallness.

    If it's going to be f#cking small, it needs to be f#cking good.

    So that means your system for supplying manpower should look not to meeting regional quotas, let alone to the sustaining of evaporated Regimental identities - least of all those which (however ancient) do not have a latter-day track record of measurable excellence.

    Frankly, faced with a choice of good units, or 'historic' units, as a taxpayer, I want good ones. If they happen to be historic, it's a minor fringe benefit to be exploited (for tourist revenue?) but being 'historic' is as likely to breed inflexibility and incompetence as it is to engender excellence.
    Summer grasses - all that is left of the dreams of soldiers

  9. #359
    Senior Member AlienFTM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    South coast
    Posts
    4,455
    Images
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by midnight View Post
    Yes and thatīs why a few forward thinking people want not to only save QDG but all the local Regiments to have such a Division in Wales where unemployment is high,thereīs already a huge presence there and more soldiers stationed there in their home areas would be a stabilising factor.The training and range facilities for the RAC are already there as are those for the Infantry,with BAOR closing it only makes sense to keep the soldiers in areas near their homes to provide stability as the job becomes harder with fewer combat soldiers available,itīs becoming a very thin red line in the next few years.
    Do the same with the North of England and Scotland and jobs linked to the new Divisions will soon spring up,the same goes for Southern England around Bovington where employment is anything but rosey.
    Do thousands of soldiers really need to be stationed in London where rents and the cost of living are so high?
    That is an entirely sensible and laudable post. More so than the Major General in the paper who pitiably pleaded to sacrifice another regiment, any regiment, to save his. If his words had been more like yours I would not have raised the subject.
    midnight likes this.
    Emsdorf and Victory!

    Drive me closer!
    I want to hit them with my sword!

    (The avatar works better if you can read the bottom line. See gallery:

    http://www.arrse.co.uk/members/alien...me-closer.html )

  10. #360
    Senior Member tally_target's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    692
    I couldn't possibly comment on the possible binning/amalgamations of RAC regiments, however the thought of a ''Welsh divison/brigade'' is really just a silly idea. The last time my unit were based in the same area as we recruited we had more G1 issues with soldiers going AWOL/CDT etc than when we were based in Germany. Basically it's all romantic bollox. You join up to get away from home (I did) .Any way does anyone know when the report of who is for the chop is out ?
    Just keeping myself to myself !

Page 36 of 61 FirstFirst ... 26343536373846 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •