- 20-04-2012, 00:07 #31Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Posts
- 32
- 20-04-2012, 00:09 #32
I'm not biased (and actually I don't care)
QDG are really good.
End of tx.
- 20-04-2012, 00:09 #33Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Posts
- 32
- 03-05-2012, 23:50 #34
- 03-05-2012, 23:53 #35
- 04-05-2012, 05:16 #36
- 04-05-2012, 07:13 #37
- 04-05-2012, 07:40 #38Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Posts
- 23,801
I know a 9/12L bloke. He's a good chap so 9/12L are the best.
I had an OC from HCR. He was a tube, so I have decided all HCR and HCMR are choppers.
- 04-05-2012, 09:32 #39
Firstly I don't know why anyone would join a MBT reg these days (RTR,QRH,KRH,SDG and RDG I think that's them all) , when will they actually deploy in their role instead of doing the RLC's job in Afghan, and the distinct lack of opportunities because of this.
Which moves me on to FR, I know LD and QDG have been two the most deployed regiments in the British Army (Definitely in the RAC) recently as in, Bosnia, Kosovo, Iraq and Afghan, which speaks for its self.
The 9/12th Lancer's are incompetent (as a Regiment that is), may be nice lads although I've still not met any decent soldiers, apart from the transferees, I don't know when they last past a regimental exercise, they also had BRF taken off them which put into question is FR good enough for BRF.
The amount of people transferring/transferred from, RTR, 9/12th, Engineers etc, but no one transferring out.
QRL have only been FR for the last few years which is obviously a set back, not their fualt.
I personally believe HCR are a bland organisation, they should either be FR, be ceremonial, but not both.
I know its a pretty lame reason to damn the HCR but honestly I think their just sh*t, I've worked with maybe ten or so in Kenya and mince springs to mind and no crack what so ever, I should'nt base the whole HCR on ten blokes but thats all I have.
So both LD and QDG have a reputable last ten years on tour, which has led to them expanding, and pretty much doing every role going, especially the last 2 tours where they had their own battle group's with each Sqn in a multitude of role's part of of the biggest high profile missions.
I also know for a fact the QDG and LD's are renowned for their crack, which may seem a small thing but it definatley makes a regiment work, and as a whole they are full of good humour, which is only positive.
So yeah I know a good bloke from the LD's so they are the best, obviously
- 04-05-2012, 10:06 #40
Whereas of course we will be out of Afghanistan (please note the -istan bit, an Afghan is a hippy's smelly coat or a rather poncy but large dog) when the Armoured Regiments will go back to their normal role. Indeed I would argue they are better because they can adopt to other roles

Anyway, the RDG are the best. They have very green trousers & managed to maintain standards even though forced to absorb the 4/7 DG.To eat well in England one must have breakfast three times a day
Somerset Maugham
London: its "buzz" and "vibrancy"... can be codewords for drugs, late-night noise and multi-culturalism run (literally) riot.




6Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




Reply With Quote











Bookmarks