Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

Join ARRSE (free) to join in and remove this advertising

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Like Tree5Likes
Discuss Re-joined and pay lost from previous service in Pay, Claims & JPA on The Army Rumour Service; Thanks for the advice Fugly. I would say it more along the lines as TSS as we run aircraft squadrons using very similar methods and very rarely run stores. Thanks again...
  1. #11
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    27
    Thanks for the advice Fugly. I would say it more along the lines as TSS as we run aircraft squadrons using very similar methods and very rarely run stores. Thanks again

  2. #12
    Senior Member Legs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Sitting in the office on my shiny backside, drinking a brew and surfing on ARRSE
    Posts
    6,753
    Quote Originally Posted by louizd View Post
    Thanks for the advice Fugly. I would say it more along the lines as TSS as we run aircraft squadrons using very similar methods and very rarely run stores. Thanks again

    Your opinion matters little. Interpretation of the regulations is what matters. You did not transfer, you left the forces, and 14 months later rejoined. As far as I can see the regulations have been correctly applied. You may warrant accelerated incremental progression, but you'll have to prove yourself first.
    Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, because you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup...

  3. #13
    Senior Member Golf_one_one's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    996
    Images
    2
    Do you have a written offer of retaining your increment level? If not, not very much you can do.

    Look at the plus side though, if you use your prior experience wisely, you will soon be eligible for promotion and you will be paid more than a level 9 SAC anyway.

    Best of luck with your Army career, be aware though, the Army does not and should not tolerate barrack room lawyers.
    Right, you F**kers, I dont Give a Bloody Bugger!

  4. #14
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    27
    Thanks for the opinion and much appreciated and I can promise you that i'm no barrack room lawyer but this site can sometimes, more often than not, be like a very bad court room. Thanks again.

  5. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    23,801
    Are we that desperate for blokes we're recruiting RAF rejects?

    At lest he didn't claim to be a LCpl equivalent.
    Nato Standard123 likes this.

  6. #16
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    27
    Legs. This is the information I have and glad to have your opinion but believe me I have shown this to many different people within the Army, including officers and senior ranks, and they also admit that it's a grey area. This is the reason I asked for advice from someone who may know of someone or have had a similar situation. Thanks very much for taking your time to extract the information and taking the time to read through it. Guess I could always transfer back to the RAF, get my pay back then transfer back to the army. Maybe not..Lol. Thanks again

  7. #17
    Senior Member Roadster280's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    4,649
    Quote Originally Posted by chocolate_frog View Post
    ...

    At lest he didn't claim to be a LCpl equivalent.
    He was an SAC, not an SAC(T). I don't think stackers have the SAC(T) appointment. They go straight to fullscrew after 15 years


    "Action this day"

  8. #18
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    27
    Thanks roadster for putting chocolate frog straight for me. Always usefull when you have someone with tri service knowledge.

  9. #19
    Senior Member Golf_one_one's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    996
    Images
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by roadster280 View Post
    He was an SAC, not an SAC(T). I don't think stackers have the SAC(T) appointment. They go straight to fullscrew after 15 years
    SAC(T) aren't LCpl equivalents either.....
    Right, you F**kers, I dont Give a Bloody Bugger!

  10. #20
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    27
    Yes, thats correct but responsibilities and role are the same as a lcpl. The RAf has 2 ranks less than the army resulting in more work to be dished around the ranks

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •