- 07-08-2011, 06:54 #11
Out of interest, why do the adults feel a need to differentiate from what their cadets wear?
Why is it that the regimental belt is too good for the kids but fine for the adults? Surely the adults are equally members of the CCF as the kids and no more members of the regiment than the kids. Same for TRFs. Surely if one can the other can? Or do people just like to look 'the real deal' whilst doing their best to make sure the kids look more similar to the scouts than their affiliated regiment?
I've definitely seen some funny CCF uniform things going on, with 1st years joining one capbadge then becoming a different one in the second (within the same Army section). And as you say, the SSI kinda lives on their own regulations. Often too do other former serving teachers / volunteers. But in the way that CCFs work as 'independent' units generally, I would personally be of the opinion that it doesn't do half as much harm as it would do in the over-political ACF / ATC etc.http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/...08_308x385.jpg
Never trust a wonky donkey.
Originally Posted by Urban Dictionary
- 08-08-2011, 15:55 #12
Many thanks SLP & CF.
CF, I have actually checked JSP313 Chapter 6, but apart from clearly stating that both cadets and Instructors should wear CCF iedntifiers, it is actually pretty short on specifics.
I guess this particular contingent is pretty good in that regard. The SSI is also a junior rank in the TA and wears his TA uniform and uses his junior rank rather than the CSjt CCF one he is entitled to. One of the Teachers is also a Capt in the TA (a rank he achieved in the Regs) which is the same regiment as his CCF contingent is affiliated to, so he wears his rank sans CCF 'subtitles' as he's entitled to.
The only potential drama is that they want heir kids to look a bit ally by wearing stable belts etc., and thereby might be inadvertantly setting the kids up to crossing a line. To be fair, both the instructors and the kids are (barring a couple of exceptions) mindful and respectful of the difference between the CCF and the Armed Forces, which was nice to witness.
- 08-08-2011, 16:18 #13Banned
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Location
- The Pub
- Posts
- 3,465
Surely its exactly the same as regimental dress regs, just with the addition of CCF titles and no tactical/ brigade flashes.
- 26-08-2011, 19:31 #14
I've just spent the last 2 training nights at a rifles ACF det... and the cadets are wearing the back badges
- 26-08-2011, 20:25 #15Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Posts
- 23,801
- 26-08-2011, 20:32 #16
You could always ask an SSI, like this chap:

No.1 Dress for Army Cadets
- 26-08-2011, 20:46 #17Senior Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Posts
- 4,479
No.2 dress? Shouldn't that be SD? Remind us which walt is this again?
EDIT: Or is that FAD? Colour looks too khaki
- 26-08-2011, 20:51 #18Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Posts
- 23,801
Where are the collar dogs for teh alledged Para WO1 SSI?
And why his is Sam Browne on back to front?
And where are his legs...Last edited by chocolate_frog; 26-08-2011 at 20:54.
- 26-08-2011, 21:07 #19
Brighton College - CCF
You'll see the same building in the background.

Last edited by QRK2; 26-08-2011 at 21:10.
- 26-08-2011, 21:11 #20
The ex regular currently TA officer must still wear CCF titles when he is acting in his capacity as a CCF officer.
I'm a TA officer who is also an ACF officer. When I'm CFAVing I wear ACF slides.A DEAD STATESMAN
I could not dig: I dared not rob:
Therefore I lied to please the mob.
Now all my lies are proved untrue
And I must face the men I slew.
What tale shall serve me here among
Mine angry and defrauded young?
Kipling: EPITAPHS 1914




1Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




Reply With Quote









Bookmarks