- 20-04-2012, 07:44 #11Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Posts
- 3,413
Cave ne sit taurus feces.
- 12-05-2012, 13:29 #12Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- USA
- Posts
- 2,777
Haven't heard that expression since 1970 Don!
Hey surr, thae bastards urr firin ball!
- 12-05-2012, 13:59 #13
- 13-05-2012, 11:23 #14Junior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Posts
- 3
I am hoping that it did! All my knowledge on the matter is based on a few documentaries by the BBC, and all the officers they have interviewed have obviously been privately educated. I am sure though that once I become more involved with it all (after Uni) I will, hopefully, find out that it isn't the case for all of them and that in fact the selection is much more liberal than my current understanding.
- 13-05-2012, 11:37 #15
- 13-05-2012, 11:49 #16Senior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Location
- Wrexham
- Posts
- 1,611
- 13-05-2012, 15:01 #17
This issue has been discussed with nauseating regularity. The bottom line that people tend to agree on is this: yes you can join any part of the army regardless of which type of school you went to. There are both ex-state school and ex-private school officers in ever regiment and corps in the Army. However, regimental selection is a two way process and potential officers naturally tend to choose regiments where they feel most at home, commonly due to the mess being already populated by likeminded souls. Therefore, the whole educational background becomes somewhat self perpetuating. The same thing might be said of other factors, for instance if you have a strong interest in playing rugby you will probably be drawn to a regiment full of rugby playing officers; that does not mean you have to play rugby to join, just that you are unlikely to choose that regiment if you do not play. In short, birds of a feather, flock together. Likeminded individuals will just tend to apply to join the same regents and this is why our regiments have distinct characters; it is not some underhanded class discrimination conspiracy. You go along to any of these regiments and provided that you are of the right quality (in terms of your potential as an army officer), they like you and as importantly you like them, then you will have no problems joining.
Please no, not the face!...
- 13-05-2012, 15:08 #18
Guards Para exists as a single Platoon, therefore 30is soldiers and 1 officer drawn from across 5 Foot Guard Battalions. Therefore if you do the maths you will see that the odds of you being the one are extremely low, however good you are. If you want to be a Para then join PARA Regt, do not join the Foot Guards because of Guards Para, because you will probably be disappointed. Incidentally, I know officers from other parts of the army who have worked on attachment/exchange at one or other of the PARA Bns and likewise HQ 16 Air Assault Brigade has plenty of non-PARA Regt officers in it.
Please no, not the face!...
- 13-05-2012, 15:25 #19Senior Member
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Location
- Leicester
- Posts
- 622
Stuff that lot, Go for 23 Pioneer Regiment RLC. fast promotion and you can do any job you fancy in the British Army! However if you are going to be a Rupert or Rodney, just remember ONE vital rule, A good officer looks after his men.
Last edited by Chunkie; 13-05-2012 at 15:29. Reason: addition
- 13-05-2012, 15:53 #20
Again, how many officers join the RLC each year (a lot), how many ask to go to 23 Regt (also a lot?), how many actually go there (not many). Also, airborne does not equal teeth arms, if you want to join the infantry do not for a moment think that any non-infantry cap badge (however "wary") will be a substitute.
Last edited by brave-coward; 13-05-2012 at 15:58.
Please no, not the face!...




3Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




Reply With Quote









Bookmarks