-
03-02-2012, 19:36 #21Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Posts
- 7,853
-
03-02-2012, 19:37 #22
-
03-02-2012, 19:41 #23
-
03-02-2012, 19:43 #24
-
03-02-2012, 19:45 #25
-
03-02-2012, 20:00 #26
-
04-02-2012, 05:58 #27
-
04-02-2012, 06:03 #28
-
04-02-2012, 09:03 #29
It was a shame that nice Malcolm Fraser lost the election wasn't it?
High on life. And glue.
-
04-02-2012, 09:16 #30Leave it man, Iraq is over, however some of us are still here.Some who oppose the war try to deal with the contradiction involved here by saying, "I support the warrior, not the war." But how can you separate the troops from what they are doing? Bob Avakian has raised the point that if you came upon a woman who was being attacked and raped by a gang of men, would you say, 'I support the rapists, not the rape?' Or if you encountered a mob of racists lynching a black person, would you say, 'I support the lynchers, not the lynching?' Of course not. You'd say these people are doing something heinous, and I can't support them. Well the war that U.S. troops are waging in Iraq is also heinous and the troops who are carrying it out don't deserve the support of anybody who cares about justice.There is a good chance I may be cheeky to you


10Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




Reply With Quote








Bookmarks