I've got a week off work in late spetember, and I'm thinking of going to the far east. I originally planned to go to Kyoto, but I hate Japanese food and don't speak a word of the language. Then I had the idea of going to Bangkok. It seems much more appealing - ladyboys, red light areas, better food.

I'm sure the NAAFI residents are familiar with this part of the world, and could put forward a persuasive argument for either of these places, or maybe an alternative destination?

PS. Lack of snakes, spiders and anything else poisonous is a major plus point.

Originally Posted by Donkey-Spanker

I've got a week off work in late spetember, and I'm thinking of going to the far east. I originally planned to go to Kyoto, but I hate Japanese food and don't speak a word of the language. Then I had the idea of going to Bangkok. It seems much more appealing - ladyboys, red light areas, better food.

I'm sure the NAAFI residents are familiar with this part of the world, and could put forward a persuasive argument for either of these places, or maybe an alternative destination?

PS. Lack of snakes, spiders and anything else poisonous is a major plus point.

Thought from were you are Skegness would be the far east :D

Uruguay, beautiful blonde haired women. Helps if you speak Spanish though. Lovely beaches and laid back attitudes.

You can invade the Argies too

VH

Fortalezza, northern Brazil...more totty than you can shake a stick at!

Do you wear Crocs?

I did Machu Pichu, Petra, Kilimanjaro, Cultural Turkey, hiking in Alaska, the Grand Canyong and sh1t like that before I came to Thailand, ostensibily on a genuine holiday.

It all went downhill fast, and I'm in Pattaya right now. Even in low season, you still have to beat them off with a big stick. Serious talent.

Originally Posted by Donkey-Spanker

I've got a week off work in late spetember, and I'm thinking of going to the far east. I originally planned to go to Kyoto, but I hate Japanese food and don't speak a word of the language. Then I had the idea of going to Bangkok. It seems much more appealing - ladyboys, red light areas, better food.

I'm sure the NAAFI residents are familiar with this part of the world, and could put forward a persuasive argument for either of these places, or maybe an alternative destination?

PS. Lack of snakes, spiders and anything else poisonous is a major plus point.

Well if you are to visit Japan, Hiroshima has got to be the place.. firstly there are numerous opportunities for inappropriate jokes regarding why the population have yellow skin, slitty eyes and bucked teeth (See what you would look like after you'd been nuked!)

Following this you can indeed go off to Thailand which has some rather attractive ladyboys... in fact possibly the best looking blokes you will ever shag!

You will no doubt enjoy a drunken blow job just remember not to swallow!!

Apart from the threat of kidnapping, I believe Bogota, Columbia is excellent for the chicks. Must be to do with the repressed Catholic upbringing.

Originally Posted by Donkey-Spanker

Originally Posted by msr

Do you wear Crocs?

Can someone explain that one please?

I think its to do with MSR questioning the original posters credentials as a man. Clearly a real man would already be in receipt of his flight tickets to Thailand, not wasting time looking at gay (no offence Jarrod) buildings in Japan.

Only a man who wears crocs would pose such a bone question.

DS. I'm surprised you are asking. Get yerself to Thailand for some "Me so horny" action. Failing that, you could always go to Brighton.