Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22
Discuss Matador in Norwegian Campaign at the Military History and Militaria forum within the The Army Rumour Service website; The area around the rear of the aircraft looks like it has just been cleared ...
  1. #11
    Senior Member 4(T)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    2,638

    Re: Matador in Norwegian Campaign

    The area around the rear of the aircraft looks like it has just been cleared of small trees - you can see the stumps and fresh wood chips.

    The other engineering equipment appears to be a bulldozer and grader - presumably for levelling a dirt strip.

    One of the guys by the Fokker might be wearing battledress, and might be carrying a slung rifle. Or he might be in civvies and smoking a pipe - the resolution of the photo is too coarse to see detail.

    The Fokkers have clearly visible serial numbers - isn't there a spotter who can trace the aircraft records?

    The undergrowth clearance would lead me to think those aircraft have been standing derelict for years by the time the photo was taken. The Fokkers appear to be on stands with their wheels removed, so they don't look like they were towed there recently.

  2. #12
    Senior Member Biscuits_Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    3,063

    Re: Matador in Norwegian Campaign

    Quote Originally Posted by 4(T)
    One of the guys by the Fokker might be wearing battledress, and might be carrying a slung rifle..
    Higher res might let you date it.

    If it's an austerity pattern BD it's almost certainly not 1940 for instance.

  3. #13
    Senior Member feu_de_joie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    117

    Re: Matador in Norwegian Campaign

    The first production Matadors were delivered in November 1939, so could well have made it to Norway. I doubt very much it was towing a 3.7" gun, as the mobile HAA was all 3" 20cwt at this time. If it was post war, I would expect a star marking on the doors and this is absent, so I think it is 1940. The tracked vehicle to the right also looks like any number of pre-war tracked vehicles. The man by the aircraft looks like he is guarding it and although there are two other men visible, the lack of people is odd. Matadors were equipped as a Forward Air Control version and I wonder if what we can see is an RAF liaison to the Norwegian Air Force?

  4. #14
    Senior Member the_boy_syrup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    7,682

    Re: Matador in Norwegian Campaign

    I agree with the comments above however I don't think it's a wartime shot
    I think it's a few years after the war looking at the picture I have tried to enlarge it a bit but it's grainy

    The first 200 AEC Matador's were ordered as R A gun tractors and started being delivered to the R A in November 1939 as F_D_J states so it could have got to Norway

    IIRC these were the first 4 x 4 trucks issued to the British Army most of it's pre war Bedfords etc were just militerised versions of civvy trucks
    Over 10,000 were built and alot were running well into the '70s and 80's as recovery trucks and timber wagons

    The British issued the trucks to Free Allied Forces the Danish Army received a post war batch so I am assuming Free Norwegion forces may have received a number


    I don't think the photo is from 1940 for the following reasons
    The Hurricane Squadrons were evacuated onto HMS Glorious which was then sunk

    You would have to reasonably assume that if the ground crew were evacuating they would have set fire to all there equipment they couldn't take including any 'lame ducks'

    Also compare the Matador with pictures of abandoned equipment at Dunkirk when they were wrecked ours looks pretty intact

    That Hurricane looks more to be a case of severe neglect than actual battle damage (although he could have been straffed by the Germans)
    As stated above it and the other aircraft look as though they have been dragged to that spot

    The chap in front appears to be wearing battle dress jacket but no wings and dosen't appear to have either a slung weapon or a holster on and as said earlier looks as though he is smoking a pipe

    Even with a British stiff upper lip there is no sense of urgency it dosen't look like an airfield which is part of a country that is being overrun there is no activity in the background or AA guns pointing skyward

    He appears more of a military tourist having a look round some old abandoned aircraft

    The fact he is wearing a battledress jacket in my view dosn't place him in the war any number of photo's from the '50's show men wearing these as work jackets

    The ground dosn't look like its been used as a grass airfield either it's un cut and appears to be full of stones and rocks

    There is also no indecation that the Germans have captured it as I can see no German equipment or men

    The Matador dosen't asppear to carry either a white star (although the Hurricane tail is blocking this) or any markings on the door nor does it appear to have any camoflage pattern (see the picture below)

    We are assuming it's green although it may be another dark colour

    Looking at the rest of the vehicles and their height compared to the Matador they seem more civillian in appearance

    Like wise I would suggest the earth mover may have come from the states however if it was being operated by the forces it would have the white star and some sort of markings on it

    Also any self respecting squaddie knowing all is lost would have stuffed it into the aircraft

    So what I think you may have a post war late 1940's early 1950's picture of a clearup of an old airfield

    Compare the paintwork an markings to 'our' Matador

    We should remember the tremendous contribution of the Queen Mother to the war effort:
    As the BBC pointed out, she 'bravely remained in London beside her husband' during the war.
    This contrasts sharply with the actions of my grandfather who, on the declaration of war immediately left his wife and children and pissed off, first to France, then North Africa, Italy, France (again) and finally Germany.
    The shame will always be with us.

  5. #15
    Senior Member 4(T)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    2,638

    Re: Matador in Norwegian Campaign

    Nice Matador. Serious question - is that "cartoon cloud" camouflage scheme authentic? Is that the first use of the black/green combination (most British Army vehicles having been gloss green in the 1930s)?

  6. #16
    Senior Member the_boy_syrup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    7,682

    Re: Matador in Norwegian Campaign

    Quote Originally Posted by 4(T)
    Nice Matador. Serious question - is that "cartoon cloud" camouflage scheme authentic? Is that the first use of the black/green combination (most British Army vehicles having been gloss green in the 1930s)?
    Sorry I may have caused confusion when I refere to 'our' Matador I mean the one in the original picture
    That matador was in Classic Military Vehicles and I got the picture from Google images

    The 'Mickey Mouse' pattern (so called because the small circles looked like Mickeys ears) was adopted in 1944
    The pattern was used on many vehicles participating in the Normandy invasion and the subsequent campaigns in France, Belgium and the Netherlands
    The white star was equivillant to the D Day stripes on aircraft and our modern day inverted V
    Thats why I don't think its from 1945 the vehicle appears to be one colour and has no other markings
    We should remember the tremendous contribution of the Queen Mother to the war effort:
    As the BBC pointed out, she 'bravely remained in London beside her husband' during the war.
    This contrasts sharply with the actions of my grandfather who, on the declaration of war immediately left his wife and children and pissed off, first to France, then North Africa, Italy, France (again) and finally Germany.
    The shame will always be with us.

  7. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,495

    Re: Matador in Norwegian Campaign

    On the other forum there was some good logic locating the airfield as Bardufoss.

    ..... my friend, Morten Moe, has the following comments about the photograph having consulted some of his books and files.

    The Fokker 333 participated in the fighting in southern Norway. In the beginning of May 1940 it was transferred to the airfield at Bardufoss in northern Norway. It may have participated in the fighting there and was left at the airfield at the end of the campaign. Since the British also had Hurricanes based at Bardufoss and left some of them behind as they withdrew, I'm convinced this photograph was taken at Bardufoss.

    Regards
    Linzee og Morten
    Here is a photo of Bardufoss airfield


    It was first used in 1938 but may have only been a strip suitable for fighters.

    The aircraft have been landed there and not taken there on low loaders so its an airfield. There weren't many airstrips in North Norway in June 1940 so Bardufos sounds reasonable.

    Maybe the photo was taken somewhere on the boundaries of this airfield. Were Hurricanes used at any other Norwegian airfields?

    Its hard to tell when the photo was taken but it could be any time from 1940 onwards.

    Here is a link to the Wikipedia entry on 46 sqn with photos donated by a relative of a member of the squadron.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No._46_Squadron_RAF

    No matador visible in the 1940 photos but that may not prove they weren't there! However the 1940 photos show trees close to the aircraft and maintenance facilities.

    Bardufoss was also use by the Luftwaffe as an airfield for operations over North Norway. Here is a photo of KG26 there.


    That looks like a much larger field than when used by the Norwegians and RAF.

    By the end of the war it collected a lot of German scrap, none of which is visible in the photo with the matador. Here is some German scrap at the airfield.


    That doesn't prove that the German scrap wasn't somewhere else on the airfield, but it raises a question.

    Here is a link to a site about the German defences in Norway

    http://www.atlantikwall-research-nor..._Troms%F6.html

    This mentions that the Norwegians did a lot of workl post war and reused german kit and defences. It also refers to the original grass strip inside a wooden (wooded?) area.

    Here is a hypothesis.

    The photo was taken under the German occupation before the Germans had enlarged the airfield to make it suitable for supporting operations by medium bombers.

    My guess is that the hurricanes and fokkers would have been recovered and recycled or destroyed during the war. The photos show the insignia only removed - probably by German units as trophies

    The Brits left a lot of stuff abandoned at Bardufoss in June 1940. At that time there were higher priorities than recovering matador trucks. There was probably a lot of abandoned stuff in Norway. The Germans made a lot of use of British kit. The battledress without insignia could have been worn by a civilian or a PW or hiwi.

  8. #18
    Senior Member rockhoppercrab's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,141

    Re: Matador in Norwegian Campaign

    Are we sure it is Norway? We supplied Finland with Hurricanes in 1940 and they were users of the Fokker as well .
    http://www.sci.fi/~fta/hu-fin-1.htm
    http://www.k-silmailumuseo.fi/?actio...to&RYHMA=7&ID=
    Given to the House of Commons 20 April 1653

    It is high time for me to put an end to your sitting in this place, which you have dishonored by your contempt of all virtue, and defiled by your practice of every vice; ye are a factious crew, and enemies to all good government; ye are a pack of mercenary wretches, and would like Esau sell your country for a mess of pottage, and like Judas betray your God for a few pieces of money.

    Is there a single virtue now remaining amongst you?

    Is there one vice you do not possess? Ye have no more religion than my horse; gold is your God; which of you have not barter’d your conscience for bribes?

    Is there a man amongst you that has the least care for the good of the Commonwealth?

    Ye sordid prostitutes have you not defil’d this sacred place, and turn’d the Lord’s temple into a den of thieves, by your immoral principles and wicked practices? Ye are grown intolerably odious to the whole nation; you were deputed here by the people to get grievances redress’d, are yourselves gone!

    So! Take away that shining bauble there, and lock up the doors. In the name of God, go!

  9. #19
    Senior Member PartTimePongo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    18,579

    Re: Matador in Norwegian Campaign

    I think that's a post war photo too , what is the vehicle in front of the Matador?

    Not sure it's Bardufoss either. The Caterpillar 'Road Grader' is a quandry too. Is it there for clearing, and if so would post-date early war, or is it there to construct a burial pit for the A/C?
    He had bought a large map representing the sea,
    Without the least vestige of land:
    And the crew were much pleased when they found it to be
    A map they could all understand.

  10. #20
    Senior Member cloudbuster's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Pastieland
    Posts
    5,680
    Images
    1

    Re: Matador in Norwegian Campaign

    Gents, thanks for your assistance with this question. Having posed the question for a member on another forum, I directed him here to view your responses. By PM he has asked me to pass on his thanks; this picture has lead to a great deal of interest in Norway, and the general concensus is that it was taken in 1940, and the bloke standing in front of the aircraft is wearing civvies.
    ARRSE - possibly the finest tri-service armed forces careers information and counselling portal in the World. Ever.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •