- 07-06-2012, 14:42 #1Senior Member

- Join Date
- May 2012
- Location
- Welling, Kent
- Posts
- 4,062
Nukes for Israel
Just caught sight of this whilst browing this is my second thread and I am not too ofay with all this cut/paste but can get by. If the link doesnt work just get onto spiegle online english. Fairly sure something is in the offing as they say. Comments?
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/israel-deploys-nuclear-weapons-on-german-built-submarines-a-836784.html
- 07-06-2012, 14:57 #2
Doubt if it's very significant, given that Israel is too small to survive a decent nuclear attack it's a natural extension to their deterrent. Realistically there's nobody to deter at the moment but that might not be the case in five years time.
That's the most foul, cruel, and bad-tempered rodent you ever set eyes on!
- 07-06-2012, 15:05 #3
Surprised that nobody's made the connection between 'unrestricted Jew-Boat warfare..'
Anyway, the issue is old news. The Israelis have had German built subs for decades, and nukes. What's much more important is if they can put the two together. They're only little diesel boats, not Trident, so you are basically looking at cruise missile capability.
They've got air launched versions, and are suspected of having these for subs as well-
Popeye (missile) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaI am not the official representative of the Digital Outreach Team from the House of Commons; we are politically impractical and cannot comment on government policy or give a political opinion.-'cos they haven't made up their minds yet.
- 07-06-2012, 16:40 #4Senior Member

- Join Date
- May 2012
- Location
- Welling, Kent
- Posts
- 4,062
its more the timing of the news i'm interested in and as you say hector, the ability to link the two. We know that Israel has come out of the closet in relation to nuclear capability but I don't believe that our stalwarts the BBC has made any mention-or if they have you've got to dig for it. The question uppermost has got to be -Now What?
- 07-06-2012, 16:50 #5
I suspect the question might be better put as "Why now?" They've had the capability for years, this is probably just a pointed reminder to the Iranians that they still do.
I am not the official representative of the Digital Outreach Team from the House of Commons; we are politically impractical and cannot comment on government policy or give a political opinion.-'cos they haven't made up their minds yet.
- 07-06-2012, 17:09 #6Senior Member

- Join Date
- May 2012
- Location
- Welling, Kent
- Posts
- 4,062
Israeli subs transiting the Suez might be considered a tad provocative in the immediate future
- 09-06-2012, 00:17 #7
Might have something to do with the news of 1.5 billion barrels of oil having been found with the promise of more to come as well as major gas reserves. The Arab nations are shitting themselves because Israel could significantly lower the price of oil by flooding the market or bececome one of the major players and remove the strangle hold OPEC and the Arab League have over the westen world.
- 09-06-2012, 00:38 #8
TSO surfaced from her Friday daze/days of Merlot when I read her 2/51's post. "It'll all boil down to water (no pun intended) as The Economist reported and, mark my words, water will be a catalyst for sabre rattling and even gunboat diplomacy or worse within the next 20 years. De-salination won't help the house of Sau'ud or the farmers of the Be'kah area." It's like watching the old Priest off "Father Ted" spouting sensibly and TSO has a valid point.
If Israel does have submarines with nuclear Cruise capabilities that leaves them open as they can only be launched from the surface - or am I wrong? I doubt very much that Israel would be able/capable/allowed to take a Boomer from the US Navy.
She still amazes me...Last edited by Negligent-Discharge; 09-06-2012 at 00:39. Reason: Mong fingers
- Si dubitas, fuge.
- 09-06-2012, 00:43 #9
- 09-06-2012, 06:34 #10
As a state Israel is an entirely self interested actor and they make no bones about it, what this will mean is they'll be even less liable to obey DC. As it is they are and have every reason to be highhanded, Israel's popularity with US voters is at all time high, up in the 70s with Republicans and bipartisan support in Congress is even higher so generous US support is assured.
Having worked with Israeli commerce I'd expect them to play hardball with all potential customers. It looks like the US is headed towards energy independence, so it'll be more a matter of Exxon Mobil interests and those are practically free floating. The Israelis will align with OPEC if it suits them, the former is mostly the Kingships and in practice those rulers have quietly been chums with Israel since the 90s and now are far more worried about Iran and worse any sign of democracy breaking out. I'd actually predict an even closer working relationship here and that is probably no bad thing for the Kingships and Israel.
What we might see is a good deal more sympathy to Israel extracted from europe, nothing like a big hydro-carbon find to start those energy hungry folk with their state linked oil majors groveling. Just recall the case with Libya and most notably the UK's abject cow tow over al-Megrahi. An eager actor in that is well in place to profit, dear old Mr Tony Blair, one of the few world leaders who ever really understood and adored the machinations of the oil majors. He'll be I'm sure heavily focused on climbing on the Israeli find's gravy train, what else are Middle East Peace Envoy's for after all?That's the most foul, cruel, and bad-tempered rodent you ever set eyes on!




13Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks



Reply With Quote








Bookmarks