Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

Join ARRSE (free) to join in and remove this advertising

Like Tree344Likes
Discuss "Are you Religious" II in The Intelligence Cell on The Army Rumour Service; Originally Posted by Higgs_bosun Prayers to thank?...thank what for what? Nothing fails like prayer...it's totally pointless except for the deluded. Logic... We have observed death for thousands of years, we have observed the way stuff ...
  1. #821
    Senior Member House Sparrow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Lundanistan
    Posts
    208
    Quote Originally Posted by Higgs_bosun View Post
    Prayers to thank?...thank what for what? Nothing fails like prayer...it's totally pointless except for the deluded.

    Logic... We have observed death for thousands of years, we have observed the way stuff works and understand the process of death, we have never observed any life after death... now think why we should be concerned about such unlikely possiblilities.

    BSL is a fine chap....so are suicide bombers high on faith.
    yep, keep banging on about the deluded bit, it furthers your retort, prayer however has been about gratitude and penance, (though I do make note of the form of prayers these days, people are so self centred now.) also I find prayer for others to be a noble thing, (though I don't really do the whole prayer thing, but the thoughts go out and such - especially at funerals and the such).

    I don't think I emphasied the; ''have you observed'' ..stance; on experiences after death.
    that would be similar to watching a car go through a tunnel, but only watching from the side of the hill that it went through.

    I think higsy, I'd like to wager a bet, not a monetary one, but a pint of ale at least, that if I get to heaven you're buying ok?

    also you cite life after death to be unlikely, which is odd.. from your point of atheistical view it would be impossible no? or are you just a closet agnostic like the rest of us? though I don't suspect a faux pas, prolly just a quick choice of wording.

    and boomie isn't a suicide bomber.
    anything else you want to add?

    (also that god's will bit from the above post; give over, you know as well I that they're either 1-havent come to terms ith the loss yet, or 2-a nut)also within that post; you claim only atheists to be reasonable, so by that admission why do you insist to hold debate amongst us heathens?)

  2. #822
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    2,186
    A challenge.

    I have no belief in any deity. I see myself as a fairly rational sort of chap and can be persuaded by reasoned, coherent argument.

    So I challenge any believer, of any faith/religion/belief, to persuade me into a belief in a god and/or to become an adherent of any religion.
    Koschei likes this.

  3. #823
    Senior Member Koschei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    2,570
    Quote Originally Posted by Taffd View Post
    So I challenge any believer, of any faith/religion/belief, to persuade me into a belief in a god and/or to become an adherent of any religion.
    Try becoming a Yazidi - it's as theologically sound as any of the others and you get to annoy the rest of the god-botherers by telling them that you technically worship Satan.

  4. #824
    Senior Member BoomShackerLacker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    By Jove
    Posts
    5,471
    Quote Originally Posted by Higgs_bosun View Post
    Me myself and I are the only moral benchmarks that exist...check Rand for details. A wider purpose is invention down to you...a selfish indulgence in blind faith is less credible than choosing trainers rather than sandals for your kids. We are all consumers so why deny it? Human nature cannot be wrong.

    I have already explained that atheism for me was not based upon a defining moment although subsequently there have been countless indicators that have strengthened my resolve...many personal. I often squirm in horror when a parent having lost a child states it was god's will... Losing faith has little to do with defining moments that you allude to. But even if the priest with cancer proclaims that there is no god...why should that be surprising? It is perfectly obvious that the cruel and mindless acts of nature have no gods involved.

    You will find no "ugly" or "vitriolic" comments directed towards reasonable people such as atheists BSL... Only irrational idiots who brainwash their children, divide society and threaten my security with their mumbo jumbo religions or faith. Sorry to inform you that I was never molested by a priest...but no! That is not the reason for my scorn either. You want to be respected by people like me? Then snap out of the cult that causes hatred... I actually care for you and your children.



    You claim again that science is fiction whilst living in a fantasy world based upon the most garbled work of fiction that man has ever been exposed to, perhaps bar one. The hypocrisy is amazing...and "we are stories" indicates that you have little grasp of reality. Irrational to the point of being unbalanced, damage by blind faith has such an effect. It is anti-intelligence BSL. You have no 'knowledge' outside of the jesus myths. This has robbed you of all dignity...other than the pity reserved for fools. The "complexity" is your own impossible position... without crazy faith in a dead guy you are empty.

    I'll stick with a 'map' that is accurate, modern and testable, each new edition reveals more astounding topograghy. With a simple compass one can find the places that actually exist. Where is your 'Truth' that is not found in the conventional signs?

    Bluster trumps wet waffle every time...
    I suppose if you keep up this megaphone style of interaction, striding through the crowds, banners-flying, attracting unquestioning acolytes, it will be enough to avoid pausing, reflecting and asking 'do I really want my to be associated with these words', and most of all, 'what have I become and what am I becoming' through such invective.

    If you operate with such pointy elbows in the real world you might well become 'a character', loved for your 'strongly drawn views', but you'll only alienate people in time. Don't be a ventriloquist's dummy for a movement that has misappropriated science way beyond its limits.
    "As we moved slowly through the outskirts of the town we passed row after row of little grey slum houses running at right angles to the embankment. At the back of one of the houses a young woman was kneeling on the stones, poking a stick up the leaden waste-pipe which ran from the sink inside and which I suppose was blocked. I had time to see everything about her - her sacking apron, her clumsy clogs, her arms reddened by the cold. She looked up as the train passed, and I was almost near enough to catch her eye." Orwell, The Road to Wigan Pier

  5. #825
    Senior Member Higgs_bosun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    3,263
    Quote Originally Posted by House Sparrow View Post
    yep, keep banging on about the deluded bit, it furthers your retort, prayer however has been about gratitude and penance, (though I do make note of the form of prayers these days, people are so self centred now.) also I find prayer for others to be a noble thing, (though I don't really do the whole prayer thing, but the thoughts go out and such - especially at funerals and the such).

    I don't think I emphasied the; ''have you observed'' ..stance; on experiences after death.
    that would be similar to watching a car go through a tunnel, but only watching from the side of the hill that it went through.

    I think higsy, I'd like to wager a bet, not a monetary one, but a pint of ale at least, that if I get to heaven you're buying ok?

    also you cite life after death to be unlikely, which is odd.. from your point of atheistical view it would be impossible no? or are you just a closet agnostic like the rest of us? though I don't suspect a faux pas, prolly just a quick choice of wording.

    and boomie isn't a suicide bomber.
    anything else you want to add?

    (also that god's will bit from the above post; give over, you know as well I that they're either 1-havent come to terms ith the loss yet, or 2-a nut)also within that post; you claim only atheists to be reasonable, so by that admission why do you insist to hold debate amongst us heathens?)
    Yep, I intend to bang on about the truth even if you can't see it, there is not an alternative.

    Prayer no matter how gratifying to the prayee cannot make it work.

    I can't think of a better reason to doubt life after death than your tunnel analogy...cheers. But if there is a bar on the other side the drinks are on me, although according to your deluded colleagues my life after death is being conducted for eternity in a pub with no beer known as hell! Daft innit?

    I'm not an agnostic but was prepared to patronise you by using the word unlikely...in terms of probability it makes god as likely as a teapot in orbit around mars.

    BSL will gladly blow himself up to ensure a place in heaven for his children...trust me. I'd just like to add that heaven does not exist.

  6. #826
    Senior Member bigpod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,212
    Images
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Taffd View Post
    A challenge.

    I have no belief in any deity. I see myself as a fairly rational sort of chap and can be persuaded by reasoned, coherent argument.

    So I challenge any believer, of any faith/religion/belief, to persuade me into a belief in a god and/or to become an adherent of any religion.
    You fail to convince me of this when you seem to have a perverse desire to see the bible as a "word for word" inerrency or to completely reject it. As any believer will be sharing their interpretation of whatever scripture they are using, we would be preset to fail.

  7. #827
    Senior Member Higgs_bosun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    3,263
    Quote Originally Posted by BoomShackerLacker View Post
    I suppose if you keep up this megaphone style of interaction, striding through the crowds, banners-flying, attracting unquestioning acolytes, it will be enough to avoid pausing, reflecting and asking 'do I really want my to be associated with these words', and most of all, 'what have I become and what am I becoming' through such invective.

    If you operate with such pointy elbows in the real world you might well become 'a character', loved for your 'strongly drawn views', but you'll only alienate people in time. Don't be a ventriloquist's dummy for a movement that has misappropriated science way beyond its limits.
    BSL...as predicted earlier in this thread you have shifted the reasoning and points to one side to make claims about the manner of criticism. Only increasing the need for extra volume of course!

    I feel no guilt for using the style of your fellow 'crusaders' past and present BTW...

  8. #828
    Senior Member BoomShackerLacker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    By Jove
    Posts
    5,471
    Quote Originally Posted by Higgs_bosun View Post
    BSL...as predicted earlier in this thread you have shifted the reasoning and points to one side to make claims about the manner of criticism. Only increasing the need for extra volume of course!

    I feel no guilt for using the style of your fellow 'crusaders' past and present BTW...
    Whatever is at the root of your disposition I'm genuinely sorry for it.
    "As we moved slowly through the outskirts of the town we passed row after row of little grey slum houses running at right angles to the embankment. At the back of one of the houses a young woman was kneeling on the stones, poking a stick up the leaden waste-pipe which ran from the sink inside and which I suppose was blocked. I had time to see everything about her - her sacking apron, her clumsy clogs, her arms reddened by the cold. She looked up as the train passed, and I was almost near enough to catch her eye." Orwell, The Road to Wigan Pier

  9. #829
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    2,186
    Quote Originally Posted by bigpod View Post
    You fail to convince me of this when you seem to have a perverse desire to see the bible as a "word for word" inerrency or to completely reject it. As any believer will be sharing their interpretation of whatever scripture they are using, we would be preset to fail.

    There is no preset to the challenge.

    Assume complete ignorance on my part. Whilst I may question what people care to post, I will not be attempting to argue an opposing view.

    For those wishing to make the attempt, feel free to argue in any style, starting from wherever you wish.

    Furthermore, I will reign in my usual abrasive style.

  10. #830
    Senior Member billybongo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    1,753
    Quote Originally Posted by bigpod View Post
    As any believer will be sharing their interpretation of whatever scripture they are using, we would be preset to fail.
    Unless he/she is a muslim. Because they would not be interpreting their scripture. Which probably means that Islam is more valid than christianity, as the latter's scriptures have been shredded by interpretation, re-writing, allegorisation, exegis and ignoring of vast chunks of it, depending on what best suits the user.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •