Useful

**Semper_Flexibilis** · 09-02-2010, 13:13

So will Harman ban herself next for being sexist or will she change her name by deed pool to Harperson?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/news...ng-sexist.html

**buttonsin3s** · 09-02-2010, 13:16

Good to know that it has it's priorities sorted then.

**StickyToffeePudding** · 09-02-2010, 13:19

Originally Posted by Semper_Flexibilis

So will Harman ban herself next for being sexist or will she change her name by deed pool to Harpieson?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/news...ng-sexist.html

There you go bud, fixed that for you ;)

I'm just wondering what the biatch will do to 'human' and 'woman'?

**leveller** · 09-02-2010, 13:19

Originally Posted by Semper_Flexibilis

So will Harman ban herself next for being sexist or will she change her name by deed pool to Harperson?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/news...ng-sexist.html

I think they (Labour Party), are trying to F everything over, before they get ousted, and leave the next lot with such a disaster to as to reflect bad on them?

**Border_Reiver** · 09-02-2010, 13:23

The continued attacks by the PC brigade to attack alleged sexism , racism etc is just further spiralling down into the realms of the ridiculous .

We had " mankind " which became " humankind " and presumably if she continues on her merry way we will eventually end up with " hupersonkind " or something else equally ridiculous .

If this story is true then surely there are more pressing items for our Government Ministers to address their attention to .

Edited for ..... typo .

**BarkingSpider** · 09-02-2010, 13:31

This is all to do with her face isn't it...
If she was a babe then her husband would still be interested in her, she'd be getting it regularly and she wouldn't feel the need to press for matters of equality and instead she'd be looking forward to her next sex session with hubby.

Anyone up for taking one for the country?

No?
Thought not.

They want to control our every thought, this lot. The sooner they're gone the better. I really hope the country doesn't fcuk up the vote at the election.

**stickybomb** · 09-02-2010, 13:32

This loony concept is rooted in the wholesale misunderstanding of the word 'man' and there was a recent newspaper article which steadily demolished it. The original meaning of 'man', IIRC, is the all-encompassing 'member of the human race'.

Thus, the article argued, the term 'chairman' is already gender neutral. The problem therefore lies with our poor command of English, not some misplaced PC concept of gender bias.

And they call this progress.

**CaptainPlume** · 09-02-2010, 13:34

It's probably on here somewhere else, but she's now an official nominee for "Rear of the Year".

Probably right as she has Ed Zachary condition...

**Mr_Deputy** · 09-02-2010, 13:35

She's a fcking tw4t.

When she was left alone to play with the toys over summer she started to do all this kind of poppycock as well.
Nevermind that alot of Labour law makers actually regret the ludicrous laws they have brought in - still continue to do it.

Although to be fair its a major thing. Just a title. But that's what annoys me - we are paying for her time and she uses it on this cr4p.

**Grownup_Rafbrat** · 09-02-2010, 13:36

This is a joke, if it's true. I've discussed this at length with a variety of lady Chairmen, from Flower Clubs to SSAFA Committees and Small Companies.

Not one of them has ever wished to be named after a piece of furniture, and all have been happy that the term 'Chairman' applies to both genders.

Typical politician - fix something that isn't broken whilst ignoring the really important stuff like crime, finances, education and health!