-
21-12-2010, 19:17 #41Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Posts
- 94
olle, are you even in the army yet,from what personal experience are you basing your opinions.
-
21-12-2010, 19:46 #42Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Posts
- 47
Chill plums, your way off the mark with some punters on here.
A course is a course, AACC will remain an attendance course for most half decent infanteers, fact. Test week is a knacker, granted but as Para Reg say, P Company is one of the easier weeks, same applies really.
148 are without a doubt the RA's best asset, it's written all over the selection and syllabus, embrace it you moody old cunt
-
21-12-2010, 23:39 #43Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Posts
- 94
thanks for the compliment pedro,and your experience with the commando couse is?.what punters on here you make them all seem like supermen what do i do when i meet them touch my ankles and lube up.its the all arms commando course not the light infantry commando course.i know all about not only half decent infanteers, but also about top infanteers i should do i dragged one of them around the whole of the commando course.now do me a favor por favor and tell me why if the marines can do the whole of the course and the same basic infantry stuff after already doing 26 weeks of the same stuff that the army do on the c.i.c. without complaining why cant the rifles.i dont give a shit if the punters on here are ex para, ex marine,are serving soldiers,the fact is the aacc doe's not belong to anybody its what opens the door to serve in the commando bigade.if some ofthe rifles dont want to do it i respect that the role was thrust upon them afterall,but if they do volunteer then they should not moan.embrace what you fucking mexican infantryman.
-
22-12-2010, 06:12 #44
-
23-12-2010, 02:04 #45Junior Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Location
- Newcastle
- Posts
- 6
-
23-12-2010, 14:27 #46Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Posts
- 94
olle, you did give an opinion about the course,you said, that all opinions are relative,and that in your opinion these lads are right and that i should just jog on.now i agree with you i am mentaly ill, a cretin, and a douche,but that has no rellevance to the topic.so if in your opinion these lads are right about the commando course,btw,which none of them have done.could you please explain to me why in your opinion they are right and i am wrong.
-
23-12-2010, 14:44 #47
Fuck, this is a bit serious, Plums has managed to hack into ARRSE, find out my real name, then hack into PAMPAS and find out what courses I have or haven´t done during my 22 years service. I wonder if he works for Wikileaks? I doubt it. In spite of their subversive agenda, at least they´re literate.
-
23-12-2010, 15:27 #48Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Posts
- 96
Isn't it right that after the end of National service and the fact that the Commandos did nothing but sunshine postings such as Singapore and Malta that the RM and AACC had become a turn up and badge course? If I remember right the standards were so poor at that time there was a very real risk of the brigade being sacked.
I think there was a big project run from the Infantry school and with a lot of Para advisors to put the Courseback to standard but I don't think that happened until about 1972.
This was one of the reasons the Conservatves nearly got rid of them just before the Falklands I think.
-
23-12-2010, 15:52 #49
-
23-12-2010, 15:54 #50


3Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks



Reply With Quote








Bookmarks