- 16-06-2012, 14:11 #61Senior Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2003
- Posts
- 553
I am sorry but there are a number of significant errors in the latter two paragraphs of your post and as for the WW2 reference, even if one was to forget the OCTU, 6 years out of 475 is not particularly statistically significant. The post '70's cold war role was not the observation of artillery fire, they did not come under wartime command of HQRA at 1 (Br) Corps for most of that period, at least since the 1980s they have had nothing to do with any Arty formation in Woolwich and had neither a SMIG nor IG attached. If fact for most of the last 20 odd years only OR Gunner PSI posts (outside the G4 world) have been one RHA Sgt and one RA SSgt)
Last edited by Bailey; 16-06-2012 at 14:18.
- 17-06-2012, 09:02 #62Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Posts
- 489
I'm not too sure that being an OCTU in the period before Adams became A-G is anything to boast about. 11 and 12 HAC, field regiments are a different matter.
The Cold War role was observation of artillery fire, eyes for the M107 batteries, with a sqn assigned to each division, and a LO party attached to each div's HQRA (the CPU LO det worked to G2), this assignment was ordered in the Corps Arty section of the Corps GDP. The observn of fire role was the reason for the Gun Troop - a training aid, which IIRC correctly lasted until the end of the CW. The SMIG may have been shared with the RA sect in London UOTC. 21 Arty Bde/Gp had IGs for RA TA field branch and that's what HAC were for technical training.
- 18-06-2012, 19:10 #63Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Posts
- 268
I can only talk of my time as an RMR recruit, failed the Cdo course twice..... in 92 the SBS Reserve were asked to put an team on every SB exercise and then most of them were full time Reserve, although one was a copper. God knows what it must be like now.
Excellent blokes and not twats either
- 18-06-2012, 19:22 #64Banned
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Posts
- 822
Very much a full time job still from what I'm led to believe. 4 years ago you had to complete AACC prior to starting any kind of advancement toward selection, that was certainly true for those having a crack at it with Poole's reserve. Makes perfect sense to benchmark candidates by ensuring they are capable of completing the base level requirment, think the SAS (r) does this with candidates ooop North, CIC and P Company I think.
- 18-06-2012, 20:01 #65
- 18-06-2012, 20:02 #66Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Posts
- 268
Yes I've heard that if you apply to do 23 you do P Coy first so you get trained up to basic soldier standard and then have a good base to do the rest of the selectoin. Plus if you drop off the 23 bit at least there is a chance you will goback to 4 para.
When I was in recruit training it was a straight transfer from an RMR unit to do SB. The benefit was that you had done pretty much weekend on / weekend off and 2 weeks at Lympstone so you already had a good skills base. Allowing for the specialist fizz I'm not sure if coming from AACC (same that the RMR do ) you would have the same basis. But soldiering is soldiering and they'd get you up to speed.
Must go and stroke my cap comforter..........
H
- 18-06-2012, 20:29 #67Banned
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Posts
- 822
Get back on the horse you fanny
If you know where you went wrong twice you should have it licked 3rd time round (unless injured of course)
..and to be fair a pass is a pass, you could even say the RFCC is the harder work as the onus is on the individual to find the motivation to get out the house at 5 every morning to beast yourself, then again after work, then attending parade nights, then going out on a weekend excercise when all your pals are on the piss, then you get back Sunday and its dhobi kit, shower, zonk, up again for some self motivated PT, then to work at 8 .... ect ect ect ect repeat repeat repeat and repeat
Not sure if I could have done it that way, months of constant hammerings at 17 and I STILL had a bad wobble on one of the tests, just the way it is.Last edited by Carlos_Sanchez_IX; 18-06-2012 at 20:36.
- 18-06-2012, 20:37 #68Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Posts
- 268
Gravity was my nemesis, If it wasn't for those pesky ropes .............
They changed the system so there was no longer a back Troop option.. I did reapply 10 yrs later after an injury after doing lots more fizz but even though my upper body had improved, ie able to do 5 pull ups which I'd never done on the previous course I just couldn't do the beep test so bye bye Hogstable.
On a positive note I've made a contribution to my TA Engr unit so always something silver lined out of everything. No I'm 40 and have properly knacked up my foot so now that is in doubt. But every time I think of Chris Terrill and he was in his 50's and 131 still have a Troop in Birmingham............... LOL.
- 18-06-2012, 20:39 #69Banned
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Posts
- 822
- 18-06-2012, 20:55 #70Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Posts
- 268
Well, quick session of see saws and he would be flying off not me. I think he shows if you are not fat / broken you can do almost anything.
Passed my last CFT at 20 kg plus 25 stone of my own weight, 27 1/2 stones all in, joyous except that my foot is now knackered. During Phase 2 the RMR SB bloke with us was amazed that I was doing a speed march at 18 stones, he said that was like me doping a Bergan carry of ........
H 1 SB Nil lol
Off to the gym, then google map B26 3BE when I get home ;)




94Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks













Bookmarks