Afghan crash Nimrod should never have flown, RAF chief admit
Discuss Afghan crash Nimrod should never have flown, RAF chief admit in Current Affairs, News and Analysis on The Army Rumour Service; Afghan crash Nimrod should never have flown, RAF chief admits
May 14 2008
A SPY plane which blew up in Afghanistan killing 14 men should not have been cleared to fly, an RAF chief admitted ...
Afghan crash Nimrod should never have flown, RAF chief admits
May 14 2008
A SPY plane which blew up in Afghanistan killing 14 men should not have been cleared to fly, an RAF chief admitted yesterday.
Air Commodore George Baber told the inquest into the deaths of the servicemen on the Nimrod plane that the hazard which caused the explosion should have been tackled earlier.
Re: Afghan crash Nimrod should never have flown, RAF chief admit
Originally Posted by rockpile
Originally Posted by box-of-frogs
Originally Posted by rockpile
Originally Posted by box-of-frogs
Hindsights a wonderful thing.
You are right. It is quite reasonable to identify a serious fault in anything mechanised and not repair it for two years.
And the chances of it happening were assessed as 'improbable'
.
Would you drive your car with a fuel leak?
Probably not, but then again i don't fly in planes that do, nor fix them. Maybe planes leak fuel all the time? I don't know. People far more knowledgeable in plane fixing decided it was improbable that it was a risk. Hence hindsight.
Re: Afghan crash Nimrod should never have flown, RAF chief admit
Originally Posted by box-of-frogs
Hindsights a wonderful thing.
...and so is ragging the frame so much you have no time to do deep maintenance whilst reducing the amount of crews that fly it whilst reducing the number of ground engineers to maintain them whilst taking on more responsbilities whilst operating in 2 of the friendliest areas of the world with a limited number of frames that are nearly 50 years old.
Bookmarks