Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

Join ARRSE (free) to join in and remove this advertising

Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Discuss US says it has right to kidnap British citizens in Current Affairs, News and Analysis on The Army Rumour Service; The Yanks don't have to, WE had them over without a fight, remember the NatWest Three! There is under international law a treaty, although the USA were at the meeting they never signed up to ...
  1. #31
    Senior Member CharlieBubbles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,763
    Images
    3

    Re: US says it has right to kidnap British citizens

    The Yanks don't have to, WE had them over without a fight, remember the NatWest Three!

    There is under international law a treaty, although the USA were at the meeting they never signed up to it, that is why they just Kidnap those they want to, no matter where they are in the world.

    Another DO as we say, NOT as we do!
    Charles Brindley

  2. #32
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    1,262
    Images
    1

    Re: US says it has right to kidnap British citizens

    Is there actually a law preventing us from doing the same?
    Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience. Our problem is that people all over the world have obeyed the dictates of leaders, and millions have been killed because of this obedience. Our problem is that people are obedient while the jails are full of petty thieves (and) the grand thieves are running the country. That’s our problem.― Howard Zinn

  3. #33
    Senior Member alib's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    8,236

    Re: US says it has right to kidnap British citizens

    Quote Originally Posted by Chuffit
    Is there actually a law preventing us from doing the same?
    Yes. And if we tried to bag a US citizen let alone some some fugitive IRA kunt we'd have a carrier group in our face.

    There is a certain type of Englishman that is hot and angry at the slightest hint of influence on the Queens' sovereignty from Brussels. Its ironic that DC can grab their greasy public school collars like they were of the inferior breeds almost without any protest from their vacillating government.
    That's the most foul, cruel, and bad-tempered rodent you ever set eyes on!

  4. #34
    Senior Member mad_mac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    927

    Re: US says it has right to kidnap British citizens

    Quote Originally Posted by Le_addeur_noir
    As the Gulfstream V aircraft described in the article Outsourcing Torture (registration N379P,later N8068V)has mabe several known and published visits to RAF bases and airports in the UK during the reign of B*liar,is it a fact that these kidnappings have,in fact already commenced?.
    That is correct, although the government still refuse to investigate.

    Two aircraft, a Boeing 737 and a Gulfstream, landed 14 times at RAF (Royal Air Force) Northolt and RAF Brize Norton between October 2003 and May 2004.

    The flights were identified by the Guardian newspaper in September 2005, which reported it had seen evidence that the Ministry of Defence “has details of the flights, including their origin and destination.”

    Previously, Foreign Secretary Jack Straw had said that the government was “unaware” of any CIA flights since 1998 using UK airspace and transporting detainees.

    The Boeing 737, registered N313P, made flights to Tripoli in Libya, Luqa in Malta, and Shannon, Ireland. The Gulfstream, registered first as N379P and later as N8068V, made stops en route to Amman in Jordan, Marrakesh in Morocco, and Doha in Qatar.

    The UK National Air Traffic Services (NATS) confirmed that aircraft with CIA tail numbers had made “around 200 journeys” through British airspace over the past five years. A spokesman said guardedly, “They might have been CIA flights taking officials rather than people in orange boiler suits.” The NATS disclosure was also made in a letter responding to parliamentary questions by the Liberal Democrats.

    The latest admissions confirm that Britain is complicit in the CIA practice of “extraordinary rendition”—i.e., flying captives to secret prisons located in countries notorious for carrying out torture. It also exposes repeated government claims that it was unaware of any rendition flights after 1998, that no records were kept, or that those records that had been kept had subsequently been destroyed. On this basis, the Blair government had rejected calls for a full investigation into rendition flights, insisting there is no evidence of any illegal activity.

    Even following the NATS disclosure, Foreign Secretary Straw continued the government stonewalling. “We know of no occasion where there has been a rendition through UK territory, or indeed over UK territory, nor do we have any reason to believe that such flights have taken place without our knowledge,” he claimed.

    However, a report by the parliamentary Foreign Affairs Committee (FAC) has criticised government ministers for failing in their “duty to investigate” allegations that US rendition flights passed through British airspace. Prime Minister Blair dismissed the criticism, saying, “There is no evidence that I know of that any of these 200 flights have been used for rendition.”
    If Treatys were reciprocated and British and US laws were given equal status with legal precedence given to the host (the nation holding the suspect), this may be within the bounds of acceptability.

    Yet again, it seems that Britain is playing a subservient role and has been intimidated into one sided agreements because it is dealing with the US.

    Perhaps if this government invested more of its GDP into intelligence and defence, we would be in stronger position to negotiate with the world super power. However its goal seems to be to change this nation into a socialist third world country. I`d like to see the US try to carry this out in China.
    In order for a war to be just, three things are necessary. First, the authority of the sovereign. Secondly, a just cause. Thirdly, a rightful intention. - Saint Thomas Aquinas

  5. #35
    Senior Member scriv184's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    paddy land
    Posts
    147

    Re: US says it has right to kidnap British citizens

    americans are a bunch off c**ts,we should invest in our own technology,what the f**k is happening to our once great country?

  6. #36
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    8

    Re: US says it has right to kidnap British citizens

    If the CIA stopped kidnappings people it would be too bright with out the vapor trails

  7. #37
    Senior Member FrankCastle's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    3,425

    Re: US says it has right to kidnap British citizens

    Quote Originally Posted by cdo_gunner
    Bottom line is that any country will say and do exactly as they please as long as all that they'll get is some harsh words.

    If the spineless government can't even put a third world country in it's place for the farcical teddybear episode. What exactly do you expect them to do against the US? Cry and go tell to the UN?
    Depressing because it's true...
    Later on, she told me the whole story.

    About the day she left her village. About the old man, about Cristu and Vera.

    About the thing her father said.

    About her baby.

    When she was done, I knew a lot of men would have to die.

  8. #38
    Senior Member In-Limbo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,757

    Re: US says it has right to kidnap British citizens

    What a bunch of lefty wnak stains for a set of media articles.

    If America (or Russia ;) ) wants to help themselves to our Scum and save Mr & Mrs average brit picking up the tax tab, then go ahead.
    I Will Always be a British Soldier

  9. #39
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    1,262
    Images
    1

    Re: US says it has right to kidnap British citizens

    Quote Originally Posted by In-Limbo
    What a bunch of lefty wnak stains for a set of media articles.

    If America (or Russia ;) ) wants to help themselves to our Scum and save Mr & Mrs average brit picking up the tax tab, then go ahead.
    What if it's you they are after?
    Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience. Our problem is that people all over the world have obeyed the dictates of leaders, and millions have been killed because of this obedience. Our problem is that people are obedient while the jails are full of petty thieves (and) the grand thieves are running the country. That’s our problem.― Howard Zinn

  10. #40
    Senior Member The_Majors_Son's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    159

    Re: US says it has right to kidnap British citizens

    If the US want to kidnap someone then let them have shot, however,
    They should recieve no help from us, and the kidnap-ee should be able to defend himself. Should the kidnap squad get caught then, its time in gaol for them.


    What i mean is, if they want to try kidnapping then let them. However they must understand it is illegal in our country and attempting to do it runs risks, and we won't help them unless we really don;t want the said individual.

    edited becuase my education didn't pay off and i can't put a point across

    TMS

Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •