- 02-12-2007, 19:36 #31
Re: US says it has right to kidnap British citizens
The Yanks don't have to, WE had them over without a fight, remember the NatWest Three!
There is under international law a treaty, although the USA were at the meeting they never signed up to it, that is why they just Kidnap those they want to, no matter where they are in the world.
Another DO as we say, NOT as we do!Charles Brindley
- 02-12-2007, 20:29 #32
Re: US says it has right to kidnap British citizens
Is there actually a law preventing us from doing the same?
Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience. Our problem is that people all over the world have obeyed the dictates of leaders, and millions have been killed because of this obedience. Our problem is that people are obedient while the jails are full of petty thieves (and) the grand thieves are running the country. That’s our problem.― Howard Zinn
- 02-12-2007, 21:52 #33
Re: US says it has right to kidnap British citizens
Yes. And if we tried to bag a US citizen let alone some some fugitive IRA kunt we'd have a carrier group in our face.
Originally Posted by Chuffit
There is a certain type of Englishman that is hot and angry at the slightest hint of influence on the Queens' sovereignty from Brussels. Its ironic that DC can grab their greasy public school collars like they were of the inferior breeds almost without any protest from their vacillating government.That's the most foul, cruel, and bad-tempered rodent you ever set eyes on!
- 02-12-2007, 23:38 #34
Re: US says it has right to kidnap British citizens
That is correct, although the government still refuse to investigate.
Originally Posted by Le_addeur_noir
If Treatys were reciprocated and British and US laws were given equal status with legal precedence given to the host (the nation holding the suspect), this may be within the bounds of acceptability.Two aircraft, a Boeing 737 and a Gulfstream, landed 14 times at RAF (Royal Air Force) Northolt and RAF Brize Norton between October 2003 and May 2004.
The flights were identified by the Guardian newspaper in September 2005, which reported it had seen evidence that the Ministry of Defence “has details of the flights, including their origin and destination.”
Previously, Foreign Secretary Jack Straw had said that the government was “unaware” of any CIA flights since 1998 using UK airspace and transporting detainees.
The Boeing 737, registered N313P, made flights to Tripoli in Libya, Luqa in Malta, and Shannon, Ireland. The Gulfstream, registered first as N379P and later as N8068V, made stops en route to Amman in Jordan, Marrakesh in Morocco, and Doha in Qatar.
The UK National Air Traffic Services (NATS) confirmed that aircraft with CIA tail numbers had made “around 200 journeys” through British airspace over the past five years. A spokesman said guardedly, “They might have been CIA flights taking officials rather than people in orange boiler suits.” The NATS disclosure was also made in a letter responding to parliamentary questions by the Liberal Democrats.
The latest admissions confirm that Britain is complicit in the CIA practice of “extraordinary rendition”—i.e., flying captives to secret prisons located in countries notorious for carrying out torture. It also exposes repeated government claims that it was unaware of any rendition flights after 1998, that no records were kept, or that those records that had been kept had subsequently been destroyed. On this basis, the Blair government had rejected calls for a full investigation into rendition flights, insisting there is no evidence of any illegal activity.
Even following the NATS disclosure, Foreign Secretary Straw continued the government stonewalling. “We know of no occasion where there has been a rendition through UK territory, or indeed over UK territory, nor do we have any reason to believe that such flights have taken place without our knowledge,” he claimed.
However, a report by the parliamentary Foreign Affairs Committee (FAC) has criticised government ministers for failing in their “duty to investigate” allegations that US rendition flights passed through British airspace. Prime Minister Blair dismissed the criticism, saying, “There is no evidence that I know of that any of these 200 flights have been used for rendition.”
Yet again, it seems that Britain is playing a subservient role and has been intimidated into one sided agreements because it is dealing with the US.
Perhaps if this government invested more of its GDP into intelligence and defence, we would be in stronger position to negotiate with the world super power. However its goal seems to be to change this nation into a socialist third world country. I`d like to see the US try to carry this out in China.In order for a war to be just, three things are necessary. First, the authority of the sovereign. Secondly, a just cause. Thirdly, a rightful intention. - Saint Thomas Aquinas
- 02-12-2007, 23:57 #35
Re: US says it has right to kidnap British citizens
americans are a bunch off c**ts,we should invest in our own technology,what the f**k is happening to our once great country?
- 02-12-2007, 23:58 #36Junior Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Posts
- 8
Re: US says it has right to kidnap British citizens
If the CIA stopped kidnappings people it would be too bright with out the vapor trails
- 03-12-2007, 00:27 #37
Re: US says it has right to kidnap British citizens
Depressing because it's true...
Originally Posted by cdo_gunner
Later on, she told me the whole story.
About the day she left her village. About the old man, about Cristu and Vera.
About the thing her father said.
About her baby.
When she was done, I knew a lot of men would have to die.
- 03-12-2007, 10:22 #38
Re: US says it has right to kidnap British citizens
What a bunch of lefty wnak stains for a set of media articles.
If America (or Russia ;) ) wants to help themselves to our Scum and save Mr & Mrs average brit picking up the tax tab, then go ahead.I Will Always be a British Soldier
- 03-12-2007, 10:32 #39
Re: US says it has right to kidnap British citizens
What if it's you they are after?
Originally Posted by In-Limbo Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience. Our problem is that people all over the world have obeyed the dictates of leaders, and millions have been killed because of this obedience. Our problem is that people are obedient while the jails are full of petty thieves (and) the grand thieves are running the country. That’s our problem.― Howard Zinn
- 03-12-2007, 10:34 #40
Re: US says it has right to kidnap British citizens
If the US want to kidnap someone then let them have shot, however,
They should recieve no help from us, and the kidnap-ee should be able to defend himself. Should the kidnap squad get caught then, its time in gaol for them.
What i mean is, if they want to try kidnapping then let them. However they must understand it is illegal in our country and attempting to do it runs risks, and we won't help them unless we really don;t want the said individual.
edited becuase my education didn't pay off and i can't put a point across
TMS




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




Reply With Quote









Bookmarks