Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

Join ARRSE (free) to join in and remove this advertising

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Discuss DHE Problems in Current Affairs, News and Analysis on The Army Rumour Service; Originally Posted by pombsen-armchair-warrior The revised JSP 464, however, has removed this leeway and now states: "At Our election You must either make good or instead pay any cost incurred by Us in making good ...
  1. #21
    Moderator ViroBono's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    7,353
    Images
    10

    Re: DHE Problems

    Quote Originally Posted by pombsen-armchair-warrior
    The revised JSP 464, however, has removed this leeway and now states:

    "At Our election You must either make good or instead pay any cost incurred by Us in making good any damage to the Property or its fixtures or fittings caused by either Your negligence or wilful or accidental damage or that of any member of Your household including family pets or any invited visitor or their pets. Damage caused by fair wear and tear and acts of God is excepted".
    So, they must do the work first and can then charge only the actual cost to them, anything else could amount to 'unjust enrichment'.

  2. #22
    Senior Member pombsen-armchair-warrior's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,965

    Re: DHE Problems

    Quote Originally Posted by ViroBono
    Quote Originally Posted by pombsen-armchair-warrior
    The revised JSP 464, however, has removed this leeway and now states:

    "At Our election You must either make good or instead pay any cost incurred by Us in making good any damage to the Property or its fixtures or fittings caused by either Your negligence or wilful or accidental damage or that of any member of Your household including family pets or any invited visitor or their pets. Damage caused by fair wear and tear and acts of God is excepted".
    So, they must do the work first and can then charge only the actual cost to them, anything else could amount to 'unjust enrichment'.
    VB,

    Good point, but it's potentially a double-edged sword. There are situations where DE might not charge the real cost, but rather a proportion of it. Lesson here is that if it is a fair cop, and the charge reasonable, then sign and accept.

    Incidentally, the same rationale applies to barrack damages. A soldier cannot be made to pay against an estimate of costs, only against the actual bill raised, which should be made visible to said soldier. Caveat above applies however.

    PAW
    'Sua Tela Tonanti' - now that's what I call a mission

    Runner-Up ARRSE Premier League 2008 - 2009, 2009 - 2010, Winner 2010 - 2011 (provisional - very provisional in hindsight), Strong contender 2011 - 2012

  3. #23
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    51

    Re: DHE Problems

    The system is now so completed it is very difficult to prove how much a job actually costs and dont forget the costs vary across the country as well.

  4. #24
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    10

    Re: DHE Problems

    I'm not really surprised to see so many problems with new move out 'ethos'. AFF is concerned that there is increasing and unrealistic pressure being put on occupants. Incorrect charges for damages have recently been used in some garrisons and a harsher move out standard is being imposed. Advice is to
    1. Make sure you have pre move out visit (up to 2 months before moving but if late posting order still ask for one) - go through the whole SFA and work out what needs to be done. Find out if there is any 'history' of the property - what was it like when you moved in. The person who said the 14 day reporting had been lost is right - another strand of work we're presently pursuing to get it replaced.
    2. Be aware that MHS (or PFI) contractors will need access to the house to work on any problems before the move out date. There is evidence that the MHS situation is improving but if you have problems then contact their complaints option on the Helpdesk number.
    3. At move out if you are charged for damages check that you have the correct charges.
    There is no doubt that it is going to get tougher - not quite back to the white gloves but SFA are going to have to be really clean. Defence Estates Ops Housing DE OH (was DHE then DEHD!) say that the majority of failed move outs are due to cleanliness, poor self decoration or pet damage so have a check that none of these are the problem.
    We all want to move into a clean house - who has moved into a house as clean as the one we left (actually I have!). I'm working for the middle ground here but what I do NOT agree with is changing what is expected after the nightmare year we've all just had.
    If you really are having trouble then contact the Army Families Federation (after Easter please!) and we'll help.

  5. #25
    Senior Member isongard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    395

    Re: DHE Problems

    you are assuming that although you have reported any faults prior to moving out ie during the time that you have occupied the quarter that they have
    1 accutally kept the appointed time
    2 even turned up
    3 you have acctually had the fault repaired at the first visit not oh this is just to asscertain the extent of the fault

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •