-
04-01-2007, 08:51 #31
Re: Forces accomdation - General speaks out.
I visited this fine establishment not so long ago.
Originally Posted by Major_Blink
Correct me if I am wrong but I had been told that a major reason the refurbishment of Abingdon was stopped was that the utility infrastucture of the camp was so old and had so little money spend on it since it was originally put in (when was the camp opened?) that it would not cope with the upgraded accomodation or any of the new buildings required.
I also heard that the correct engineering solution would be to renew the infrastructure completely which was rejected as being too expensive. This of course puts the camp's rebuild state into limbo
Would it prove cheaper in the long run just to tear the place down and start again from stratch?War is a game that is played with a smile. If you can't smile, grin. If you can't grin, keep out of the way till you can.
-Sir Winston Churchill
-
04-01-2007, 08:58 #32Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Posts
- 340
Re: Forces accomdation - General speaks out.
Timt to bomb MPs with JPEGs and MPEGs and flash a few DVDs around Fleet Street and Health & Safety Executive plus a few channels like CNN and Al-Jazeera
-
04-01-2007, 09:02 #33Senior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Posts
- 8,094
Re: Forces accomdation - General speaks out.
Yes
I think there needs to be a campaign set up, but should it be co-ordinated under BAFF
-
04-01-2007, 09:04 #34Member
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Posts
- 51
Re: Forces accomdation - General speaks out.
Don't bother trying to take a shower at RAF Uxbridge from about October onwards every year. At this time they do a routine check for Legionella virus and for the last three years they have had to shut down the whole system whilst it is 'flushed out'. Allegedly, in winter 05/06 there was no hot water in the barrack blocks for almost 3 months.
Not quite the same scale of some of the BBC pictures but indicative that we cannot even afford to maintain the crap we currently have to endure.
-
04-01-2007, 09:22 #35
Re: Forces accomdation - General speaks out.
Contrast and compare this thread with some of the comments on
http://www.arrse.co.uk/cpgn2/Forums/...ic/t=2154.html
and
http://www.arrse.co.uk/cpgn2/Forums/...c/t=43326.html
Now I am not saying there is a link but it does makes me wonder...-------------------------------------------------------------
Growing old is mandatory, growing wise is optional
---------------------------------------------------------------
Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes. Vel vos utor Google
-
04-01-2007, 09:30 #36
Re: Forces accomdation - General speaks out.
I was interviewed about this on the BBC R4 'Today' programme shortly after 7.30.
British Armed Forces Federation - www.baff.org.uk
-
04-01-2007, 09:30 #37
Re: Forces accomdation - General speaks out.
Steven
Had a quick look and failed to see what you are getting at. What's your point?War is a game that is played with a smile. If you can't smile, grin. If you can't grin, keep out of the way till you can.
-Sir Winston Churchill
-
04-01-2007, 09:35 #38
Re: Forces accomdation - General speaks out.
One of the major problems in this area is that great portions of the estate budgets go to paying fees to works contractors like Carillion. In the old days, we had a lumbering public sector estate works organisation called PSA, which worked, if inefficiently, and the costs were more defined (maybe someone will tell me otherwise). Now we have apparent inefficiency and huge fees to the civilian contractors. That's why simple jobs end up costing £2k rather than £100, and why so many important maintenance jobs get prioritised down the calendar. So, how much of that £700M went in fees?
There is another issue with accommodation - charges. The grading system for charges does not allow a board to arrive at a simple opinion that accommodation is simply shite and should be 'ungraded' - eg no charges to pay. The penalty points system is quite comprehensive but rarely are enough points awarded to bring the grade and charges down to a level that matches the "would I want to live in this" criterion. There needs to be a minimum acceptable standard for accommodation, but that aside what really grates singlies (and this does really affect singlies rather than pads) is having to pay for substandard accommodation. I know of plenty of instances where singlies have been (relatively) happy to slum it in exchange for an extra £100 each month. Likewise when individuals are moved from ungraded accommodation into new Grade 1, they are mostly very unhappy.
So, MOD, my suggestion to you is reduce accommodation charges across the board, including for SFA, and waive charges for the substandard SLA. You will find that while the problem does not go away, there will be a lot less complaining and there might then be opportunities to achieve a better resolution than Z type across the board, which most servicemen will never see anyway.
I should add that the hapless unit QM is caught in the middle of all of this, with inadequate resources to achieve much at all. It is the MOD works and estate management system that is at fault, not the units tring to make the most of what they are given.
-
04-01-2007, 09:36 #39
Re: Forces accomdation - General speaks out.
Exactly what I was thinking!
Originally Posted by Interceptor
Squaddie: "Look at my bath!"
MOD: "And...?"
BBC: "Ooooh look! That's terrible!""Do I look like a reasonable man? Or a peppermint nightmare?"
"Did you enjoy that boy, cockney urine all over your face? That was a bad time for you wasn't it?"
-
04-01-2007, 09:57 #40
Re: Forces accomdation - General speaks out.
It is good that this issue is being aired in public as it is clear that the politicians will not listen to reason and the only way to get the necessary funding is for senior military to go public.
Whilst there probably is a plan to upgrade all the accommodation over the next few years, what is criminal is the complete lack of investment for the last 20 years. As such both single and married accommodation has been allowed to deteriorate to such an extent that a greater capital investment is required now, rather than keeping on top of it each year.
The points and grading system for MQs is archaic and doesn't allow common sense to be applied. I had a year long battle to get my MQ downgraded from Grade 2 when the noise was unbearable as it is sandwiched between a v busy dual carriageway, a mainline railway and under an AAC flight path! Eventually persistence paid off but the reduction in charges is not retrospective and is only effective 3 months after the Board Of Officers has published its results!It's a scorpion not a lobster
-
04-01-2007, 10:14 #41Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Posts
- 6,241
Re: Forces accomdation - General speaks out.
I've had no heating in my MQ for over a week now other than a gas fire in the living room and an electric heater lent to us by my parents for upstairs. It's been so long since our central heating has been flushed through that the water in the system is so gipping that it has actually starting corroding through the radiators from the inside - four have developed serious leaks since October, including three in a week and a bit over Christmas including one leaking over several Christmas presents the day before Christmas Eve. When I contacted MHS (the new improved, sold off DHE) about the last one, they refused to even send a plumber out to look at it because they weren't authorised to call out an engineer between Christmas and New Year, so I had to get the radiator switched off myself (as in properly switched off, not just turning the control at the end to 'off'). Now my wife's too scared to have the central heating switched on in case another one goes while we're out and causes serious damage to the house or our possessions.
-
04-01-2007, 10:14 #42
Re: Forces accomdation - General speaks out.
I have particularly 'fond' memories of the R SIGNALS Corps Mess transit Accomodation in Blandford. This consisted of a a portacabin, 6 beds to a room. On the Sunday I pitched up for a career course, I found a bed frame minus half of the springs. Having bodged it together with an MFO box, I placed the pisss-stained mattress on top. Next - locker minus one door and no hanger rail. Carpet stained with pisss and vomit - absolutely rubbish.
Mind the RLC central Mess in Bicester was also a shocker. You can lie on your bed and touch opposite walls with your hands. No curtains, half a locker and the cure for cancer growing on the abloution floors. Absolutely stinking.
-
04-01-2007, 10:15 #43
Re: Forces accomdation - General speaks out.
There was a time when the block was inspected/maintained by the simple provision of block inspections/self help, now I know this is no use if the walls are falling down etc but it did seem to help.
Originally Posted by in_the_cheapseats
Now according to some, as highlighted in the other threads, block inspections and the like are infringements on the guys human rights and they are all grown ups etc etc.
I know that this is not the ONLY cause but as I said it just makes me wonder if it is all part of the same problem?
Thoughts?-------------------------------------------------------------
Growing old is mandatory, growing wise is optional
---------------------------------------------------------------
Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes. Vel vos utor Google
-
04-01-2007, 10:24 #44
Re: Forces accomdation - General speaks out.
Let's say that the accommodation was for nurses rather than squaddies. Would the government have acted? I think so.
-
04-01-2007, 10:31 #45
Re: Forces accomdation - General speaks out.
I have just received an envelope from Def Est with the 2006 Customer Survey (nice timing?!?). I will fill it out accurately and honestly, knowing that you can make statistics say anything. The thing that bugs the heck out of me is that the return envelope is to a Bloody Civvi Data Collecting Agency!!!!!!!! How much is that going to cost just to find out that they need to make up their own conclusion????(and probably will).
I am happy with my present accn but have had nightmares in the past, both as a LIM and PAD. Maybe we do need to go down the line like other Armed Forces of longer postings and 'find your own place', subsidised at a reasonable rate. The system is burning more money on administration than on solving the problem, go figure. We have so many 'trained' artisans in the forces who aren't allowed to practice their trade or are misemployed yet still paid for the qual. Many want to carry out their trade, why not let them crack on? If it's because they haven't got the Governmentaly Recognised qualifications - why have them in the forces? Plumbers, Sparkies, Chippies etc, they could probably sort out a row of semi detatched houses in half the time it takes the local contractors or MOD Recognised, over priced, lazy, underskilled planks that we all know and love.Knowing when NOT to work hard is just as important as knowing when to..
-


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks





Reply With Quote






Bookmarks