Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

Join ARRSE (free) to join in and remove this advertising

Page 11 of 36 FirstFirst ... 91011121321 ... LastLast
Like Tree154Likes
Discuss Scotland v Tories - save the Scottish Regiments round 2 in Current Affairs, News and Analysis on The Army Rumour Service; Originally Posted by 2/51 Bridge of Don closed its doors toe the Regular army in...IIYC 1986. TA/SAAFA/RNR/Motorcycle training use the original barracks now, all the newer building were sold to Aberdeen College and various building ...
  1. #101
    Senior Member CanteenCowboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Paisley
    Posts
    944
    Quote Originally Posted by 2/51 View Post
    Bridge of Don closed its doors toe the Regular army in...IIYC 1986. TA/SAAFA/RNR/Motorcycle training use the original barracks now, all the newer building were sold to Aberdeen College and various building contractors.

    As for the Daily Records attempt to wind up a frenzy against "the Tory cuts". Well, they seem to have a short memory, as does the Labour party, who cretaed the RRS in 2004 and before that, amalgamated the Gordons/Queens Own as well as most of the Rifle Brigade.

    As said already, these regiments stopped being in 2004. The RRS shot itself in the foot by insisting on keeping the individual Regimental identites, including creating totally new ones in the case of 6 and 7 scots (new coloured hackles and so on). The RGJ etc took the right attitude and embrased a new regiment and I believe recruitment for the Rifles is high. Up here everyone goes on about it not being like it was when the Gordons were here..and so on. I am mighty proud to have been a Gordon, I am mighty proud to have been a Highlander but I cannot understand why some people are not proud to have been in the RRS.
    Hmm, 26 March 2006 if you please.

  2. #102
    Senior Member Trans-sane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    2,085
    Quote Originally Posted by CanteenCowboy View Post
    No I am not a Rangers Fan, far from it, however unlike you I do not believe that Scotland could make it on it's own, ESPECIALLY in the current economic climate. I am sure that the EU would welcome another small nation in with open arms, just for it to fail miserably just like Greece, where is all the revenue going to come from to pay for Salmond's lovely little land? I want to know because so far he has not given the public any idea of what would happen if Scotland was to vote for independance, all the nationalists have said is "The oil will pay for it all." What fucking oil, that has a finite lifespan, where is the alternative manufacturing base, where is the greatly needed investment into alternative energy supplies, what is the plan for Scotland and most importantly WHERE'S THE FUCKING MONEY COMING FROM???

    However I am sure that with your excellent grasp of international money markets and finance you will be able to work it all out for Salmond, because I have seen NO EVIDENCE that he has even thought about it. He is banking on enough fools being blinded by Tartan fervour and voting ourselves into oblivion, just to pamper his own little ego.
    Plus the fact that a significant (and disproportionate) percentage of revenue raised by income tax would be lost after independence when several Central Government functions would be relocated back south of the border. If you Jocks decide to go independent there is no mileage in Westminster keeping Inland Revenue or army HR and reccords in a foreign nation and paying for the priviledge. You'd have to fund your own NHS, education, bin men etc. Basically anyone working in the public sector north of the border would be in danger of loosing their job with the added seasoning that in doing so they would no longer be providing revenue to the new government in the form of income tax or NI.
    I'm not always this cynical. I am usually worse...

  3. #103
    Senior Member Bouillabaisse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    3,271
    Quote Originally Posted by twentyfirstoffoot View Post
    Could you explain where the Troopships and Cargo vessels are then?
    Luxury Cruise Ships : Luxury Ocean Liners Cruise Travel : Cunard Cruise Line - Cunard
    When the Royal Marines go to war they like to go in style. It gives them somewhere to wear their best frocks before the kick off.


    Maersk - Home


    On a serious note - there's enough amphibious lift in the RN, RFA and STUFT to carry the size of expeditionary force that we can put together these days.
    CanteenCowboy likes this.
    A l'eau; C'est l'heure.

  4. #104
    Senior Member TARA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    440
    United with NI-you wish!
    It is warm work and this day may be the last to us at any moment, but mark you! I would not be elsewhere for thousands.
    SAOR ALBA

  5. #105
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    2,653
    Quote Originally Posted by gunfighter View Post
    Ah sarcasm .....the lowest form of wit ...... First they riducle you; then they fight you; then you win !! (Ghandi)

    I speak only for my self and those who like me have had enough of London rule. If that doesn't include you then that s fine by me.
    glad to hear it. i just dont like the way the debate on independance has become so polarised.

    i had someone getting worked up and throwing "aw, so you're a bloody nationalist!?" at me this wk because i said we should scrap trident, because clearly you cant want one without the other.
    "I think i am becoming a god."
    Vespasian

  6. #106
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    200
    The RN can no longer maintain a patrol off the Horn of Africa.

    All troop movement and heavy lift is done by civilian companies with a fraction being moved by RN RAF.

    I am sorry but the transportation and support of an expeditionary 'force' any larger than taking an Infantry Bn based BG on an unopposed long week-end show of force in well beyond the capability of all three sevices combined.
    CanteenCowboy likes this.

  7. #107
    Senior Member 2/51's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Land of the Gordons
    Posts
    2,218
    Images
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by CanteenCowboy View Post
    Hmm, 26 March 2006 if you please.
    Sorry...I have 1994 on the brain and slipped in a 4, not a 6. I gratefully stand corrected.
    CanteenCowboy likes this.

  8. #108
    Senior Member Bouillabaisse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    3,271
    Quote Originally Posted by twentyfirstoffoot View Post
    The RN can no longer maintain a patrol off the Horn of Africa.

    All troop movement and heavy lift is done by civilian companies with a fraction being moved by RN RAF.

    I am sorry but the transportation and support of an expeditionary 'force' any larger than taking an Infantry Bn based BG on an unopposed long week-end show of force in well beyond the capability of all three sevices combined.
    The only time the RN really carries troops in anything other than the amphbious ships is generally without their weapons and with their feet wet from wading. We've always use commercial shipping to carry men and materiel and it's no different now. the RN provides the protection and ensures freedom of passage.

    To put it into green terms, the RN are the cavalry, swanning about on the edge of the battle. They keep the enemy from interfering with the movement of the plodding infantry whilst at the same time providing some dash, swagger and panache to the battlefield. They may not decide the issue, but they create the environment that allows others to.
    Guns likes this.
    A l'eau; C'est l'heure.

  9. #109
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    200
    Quote Originally Posted by Bouillabaisse View Post
    The only time the RN really carries troops in anything other than the amphbious ships is generally without their weapons and with their feet wet from wading. We've always use commercial shipping to carry men and materiel and it's no different now. the RN provides the protection and ensures freedom of passage.

    To put it into green terms, the RN are the cavalry, swanning about on the edge of the battle. They keep the enemy from interfering with the movement of the plodding infantry whilst at the same time providing some dash, swagger and panache to the battlefield. They may not decide the issue, but they create the environment that allows others to.
    Which is a huge leap from your original statement

    Quote Originally Posted by Bouillabaisse View Post
    the navy takes the army where it needs to be, ensures its supplied when its there and takes it away again afterwards,

  10. #110
    Senior Member brettarider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    7,528
    Quote Originally Posted by Oyibo View Post
    From what I gather, man people are proud to join the Rifles. Why not work on building the same esprit de corps with a new Scottish Regiment?
    Great idea they could call it the Scottish Rifles only they walked into the history books in 1968.

Page 11 of 36 FirstFirst ... 91011121321 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •