- 12-05-2012, 08:52 #51
You might recall in background of the Lehman crisis was a small London office of AIG that made a shit load of money selling very dubious CDS's. AIG ended up 80% nationalized by the Fed as a result, Goldman might have gone down otherwise.
This sort of thing isn't by any stretch of the imagination "capitalism in the raw", it's a pretty bloodless buisness. As Adam Smith noted large players will always seek to dominate and rig markets which is why you need government but these guys are huge transnational entities that even DC has limited control over. This is a very sheltered arrangement with an almost fully socialized risk for biggest players, the odds are at worst they'll end up wards of their host state while they recover more likely the larger players bloat up as they cannibalize the smaller fish that still live in the wild.That's the most foul, cruel, and bad-tempered rodent you ever set eyes on!
- 12-05-2012, 09:33 #52Probably the same as me. Although everyone was chunting about their shares and next years bonus in the restaurant.
Originally Posted by Effendi:4395556 If you have some spare change and you feel like doing a good thing, please consider giving it to Combat Stress. Thank you. JustGiving
- 12-05-2012, 11:21 #53
The funniest thing about the financial crisis (so far) is that politicians haven't really learnt any lessons from the past. But hey, more regulation always works!
Politicians, in implementing Basel III, have seriously crimped bank profitability for the next few years. Yay. The result? Banks are already re-structing their businesses away from those parts of the business that are penalized such as CDO trading & issuance (not that they need much of a push here)...but also lending to risk businesses because it's prohibitively expensive in capital terms.
The end result of this new legislation is banks move further from their core businesses of lending and will create new products not covered by the rules (as they always have) and most importantly of all competition will be crushed as the barriers of entry to the industry have been raised A LOT. So banks end up with greater profitability in the long-run and much bigger banks.
It's like forcing banks to pay higher salaries to reduce the bonus component. In the old days crap bankers would leave (when they didn't get good bonuses) to go to shitter banks and then their careers were over. No it's damn hard to fire them and they cling on to their high base salaries.It was good while it lasted.
- 12-05-2012, 11:30 #54Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Posts
- 2,064
Wheres this 2 billion gone ? .... if JP Morgans lost it... whos gained it ? maybe a host of smaller and more deserving institutions ?
maybe an eccentric philanthropist intent on saving a tribe of Amazonian indians with an abundance of herbal lore ..
- 12-05-2012, 11:31 #55Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Posts
- 2,064
- 12-05-2012, 11:33 #56
- 12-05-2012, 11:49 #57Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Posts
- 2,064
- 12-05-2012, 11:51 #58
- 12-05-2012, 11:54 #59Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Posts
- 2,064
... so if a bank/ investment house gets the money back I cant see the prob.. were back where we started... christ, thats not an economy.. its a money-go-round.
why can t Britain train its kids to build and invent stuff anymore.
- 12-05-2012, 11:56 #60




16Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




Reply With Quote








Bookmarks