- 07-05-2012, 08:17 #41
Hollande wil do all he can to save the French banks, he has no choice, they have dug themselves a deep hole that will take down the rest of the economy if he does not. Sarko has basically been sitting on his hands while blindly following an all at sea Merkel. The question is how does he avoid a recession that'll further deepen France's sovereign debt at the same time?
One size fit all EU wide austerity wasn't ever a solution to those problems, it was largely about delusional German politics not real world economics, it's an economically perverse strategy that's retarding growth everywhere it is applied. Examples of indebted nations cutting their way to stability are damn few and they were all based on strong export growth, without that austerity is a recipe for permanent penury.That's the most foul, cruel, and bad-tempered rodent you ever set eyes on!
- 07-05-2012, 08:47 #42"Crows", Carrion feeders. Fairly apt given the current situation.Newly elected president Francois Hollande waves to the crows flanked by his partner Valerie Trierweiler
B
France elections 2012: François Hollande victory sets EU on course for turmoil - Telegraph"It is pointless having armies deployed abroad when there is no prudent council at home." Seneca (c. 3 BC – 65 AD)
"Government's a fuck up, half the Civil Service is out to lunch. The Foreign Office is as much use as a wet dream, the country is stoney-broke and the bankers are taking our money and giving us the finger." D J M Cornwell (1931AD- )
- 07-05-2012, 08:52 #43
"The truth is that commentators rush out their opinions based on their preconceived notions before they know the full facts"
The Arabist blog
http://www.arabist.net/blog/2012/7/1...on-debate.html
- 07-05-2012, 09:00 #44
All governments of course spend other people's money. The left/Socialists just take it beyond the pale with high taxes, useless laws and jobs that serve no purpose (e.g. PCSOs/Blunkett's Bobbies)
The last Labour government not only spent the money of our children with their profligate spending, but also squandered the legacy of our country by the rock bottom sale of 60% of our nation's gold reserves.
Sale of UK gold reserves, 1999-2002 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The problem with big government is that if you end up with a muppet in power, the scale of devastation left behind is quite widespread.
- 07-05-2012, 09:07 #45
- 07-05-2012, 09:10 #46
- 07-05-2012, 09:19 #47
Beyond the pale?
Thatcher took basic utilities and rather than the efficient provision of it being the duty of the government of the day, abdicted the responsibility of its provision to the public sector.
The New Labour (more conservative inspired authoritarian centre-left) didn't challenge it, and carried on passing laws for some reason known best to themselves.
We now have a pack of jokers who are busy preparing to hand law enforcement over to KBR?! And they are also authoritarian and useless. Just take the ban on Pirate Bay. It will not work. Likewise their upcomign Online Safety Bill, that will not work. Children will run rings around ministers.
So whilst we can have a corporate jamboree down in East London, protected by an everly increasinly armed police (put beyond effective scrutiny) your local hospital cannot get you a bed and competes in a daft unworkable internal market, your schools are following an equal bizzare policy.
But that's OK as I rather suspect our "governing class" don't use public services, unless compelled to for a publicity shot (backed up by private augmentation services).
And that is not a threat restricted to the left. The problem is when you raise the spectre of "big government" you end up abandoning responsibility for "freedom"; the marvellous equality of the law which forbids both rich and poor to sleep under bridges and steal bread.The problem with big government is that if you end up with a muppet in power, the scale of devastation left behind is quite widespread.
I could do with efficient and professional government for a start.
"The truth is that commentators rush out their opinions based on their preconceived notions before they know the full facts"
The Arabist blog
http://www.arabist.net/blog/2012/7/1...on-debate.html
- 07-05-2012, 09:20 #48
"The truth is that commentators rush out their opinions based on their preconceived notions before they know the full facts"
The Arabist blog
http://www.arabist.net/blog/2012/7/1...on-debate.html
- 07-05-2012, 09:25 #49
<switches light on> Yep, electric's working
<switches central heating on> Yep, gas is working
<looks in garden> Yep, bin lid still closes
<runs tap> Yep, waters on
<types reply on computer> Yep, broadband is working
Yep, them essential services are fucked since they got privatised!
- 07-05-2012, 09:32 #50
yes everything can be privatised but should it? Some things have fared better run under a common plan if not centrally controlled. Locally run interests such as our own reservoir have always been a success, even now it is full yet we have a drought order thanks to South east Water who are only responsible for our drains here. Before the local water company was privatised we didnt have a drought order, not even in 1976 and that was much worse than now. Locally run our water supply was better managed. Our trains however were better under BR here, shorter journey times and actually turned a profit despite passenger numbers being lower.
Yes I want to pick and choose as do a lot of folk and if that doesnt fit with political ideologies then tough fucking tits. As for Network Rail that is ann organisation that makes Railtrack look caring and responsible. Muppets!"I'd rather be a tired old Has been, than a tired old Never Has Been!!"
"If the women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy."
Semper in excremento sum, solum profunditas mutat
According to Ispeakcrabandpongo "Typically Island Ape Brits," That suits me!
http://bashingbambi.blogspot.com/
http://www.dogtrainingsupplies.co.uk/
http://www.tcswoodlands.com/
http://urbanfoxcontrol.weebly.com/




62Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks





Reply With Quote









Bookmarks