- 30-04-2012, 17:24 #221
That doesn't answer the question though. You're suggesting imposing limits on treatment for fat people, what about people who break legs playing sport? They still require treatment because of their lifestyle. What about people injured in RTAs? No-one forced them to drive, they're injured because of their lifestyle.
You see where it goes if you take away universal health care based on lifestyle?
As for 'fat fucks no working', if we only treat current tax payers that's an awful lot of pensioners who suddenly don't get health care anymore.
- 30-04-2012, 17:24 #222
- 30-04-2012, 17:25 #223
No treatment for smokers or the obese: Doctors back measures to deny procedures for those with unhealthier lifestyles | Mail Online
The Doctors know the wheels are coming off the NHS gravy train.Warning, this post contains some flash photography.
- 30-04-2012, 17:30 #224
- 30-04-2012, 17:31 #225
if your obese your just going to die on the table ifthey try to operate on you.
anasethics and hippopigs dont mix.
little point doing a heart and lung work on someone smoking.On a Hot morning in cyprus I found the meaning of anger. Fortunataly I was comftably numb.
The RSM and various other NCO's seemed very agitated.
maybe they should look into counselling?
- 30-04-2012, 17:34 #226
- 30-04-2012, 17:35 #227Arrse's very own bartender imparting wisdom, wit and all things boozey.
http://www.arrse.co.uk/Forums/viewtopic/t=123047.html
Crime & Punishment in Colonial Kenya: Bibliography Thread
http://www.arrse.co.uk/intelligence-...hy-thread.html
- 30-04-2012, 17:47 #228Night time is really the best time to work. All the ideas are there to be yours because everyone else is asleep. ~Catherine O'Hara
RayC is a pig fucker.RayCbums goats.RayCsuckshorses. Earth is RayC's sockpuppet and P.Maitra is a fat goat sucker.
- 30-04-2012, 17:50 #229
No more medical treatment for pregnant women - they're pregnant because of their lifestyle.
No more medical treatment for pensioners - they're not taxpayers.
No more NHS treatment for injured soldiers - they're injured because of their lifestyle.
There's plenty of people you could refuse treatment to based on lifestyle or tax payments. And as soon as you allow the Government to do it to one group you can guarantee that plenty of others won't be far behind.
- 30-04-2012, 18:03 #230
I agree that there is difficulty here, but I think you could argue that playing rugby, for instance, contributes to fitness, moral and physical robustness and personal responsibility, arguments that would be hard to make for smoking. That said, smokers put far more into the system by way of taxes than they take out in terms of treatment (or at least that was the case in 2002 when I last actively researched it).
I wouldn't want to go down the route of discriminating over lifestyles, but if the NHS was purely about health and not about lifestyle (IVF, plastic surgery (excepting accident victims), sex changes etc) then we may not have to. Also, Note to Self for fat fucks - bed sores hurt, if you don't want them then you know the drill, but don't expect a big comfy bed!




128Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks





Reply With Quote








Bookmarks