Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

Join ARRSE (free) to join in and remove this advertising

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Like Tree8Likes
Discuss ASTER missile cuts the mustard. in Current Affairs, News and Analysis on The Army Rumour Service; Originally Posted by chocolate_frog That's a fcuking joke right? Radiating the oceans doesn't really float my boat I'm afraid. Strategic nukes fine, we'll never use them and if we do it's game over. Tactials are ...
  1. #31
    Senior Member IndependentBoffin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    637
    Quote Originally Posted by chocolate_frog View Post
    That's a fcuking joke right?

    Radiating the oceans doesn't really float my boat I'm afraid. Strategic nukes fine, we'll never use them and if we do it's game over. Tactials are small enough that some brain donor will actually use them.
    Nice sentiment but two comments:
    1) Do you think some of our enemies care about irradiating the oceans? Actually we never did when we were developing our nuclear arsenals:
    Bikini Atoll - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    2) There may come a day when we would need to use tactical nukes, or would want a missile with long range, guaranteed fleet-kill capability.

  2. #32
    Senior Member SUU23's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    North West
    Posts
    5,708
    Quote Originally Posted by sunnoficarus View Post
    Nope, we've already covered this.
    But it now has a proven capability to take out ballistic missiles and the most deadly of anti ship missile threats.
    And cricket balls. Allegedly.

  3. #33
    Senior Member IndependentBoffin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    637
    Actually come to think of it the easiest way to achieve a missile/torpedo hybrid without having to fiddle with getting the geometry and nosecone profile simultaneously right for air/aquatic travel is to have something like a UAV-torpedo hybrid.

    The UAV carries a supercavitating torpedo towards the target using a fuel efficient turbofan, and drops the supercavitating torpedo into the water the moment it detects countermeasures being launched.

    A UAV-torpedo hybrid is at a much higher TRL than a single, unified missile/torpedo hybrid. Actually we are already there - both armed UAVs and supercavitating torpedoes exist.

  4. #34
    Senior Member SUU23's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    North West
    Posts
    5,708
    Mr Hitler beat you to the concept with the Henschel Hs294.

  5. #35
    Senior Member IndependentBoffin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    637
    Quote Originally Posted by chocolate_frog View Post
    A novel suggestion... but what about endurance? Will the ASM/Torp be capable of 200% distance in both air or sea? Or a 50/50 split? What happens to the ASM when it has to 'dive, dive, dive' further away than it has underwater endurance?

    Be better of providing the ASM with some sort of crude counter-measure device against the incoming missile.
    The airborne missile configuration is more efficient in terms of covering distance per kg of fuel burnt, especially if travelling subsonically where wave drag is not a concern.

    Consider that the VA-111 Shkval supercavitating torpedo weighed 2700kg and has a range of ~10km. Meanwhile a AS-6 Kingfish missile has a mass of 4000kg but a range of 300-700km.

    While the hybrid is airborne, it is vulnerable. If it has to dive beyond the range of its torpedo stage, it will fall short of the target.

    Possible solutions to this are:
    1) More energy dense propellants for the torpedo stage
    2) Optimised nosecone and body profile of the supercavitating torpedo stage using CFD simulation
    3) Rocket booster stages which drop off, like ground-space rockets
    4) Nuclear thermal propulsion

  6. #36
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    A padded cell
    Posts
    4,489
    Quote Originally Posted by sunnoficarus View Post
    The Goalkeers? Bay Class perhaps? The cloggie ones have one apiece up front.
    For sale, it would seem: Ministry of Defence | Defence For... | Business | DSA | Maritime Equipment Sales

  7. #37
    Senior Member syledis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Thats my boat , that is
    Posts
    2,822
    Quote Originally Posted by Gassing_Badgers View Post
    Wow, I see a future super-thread coming...

    Super-cavitating torpedo-missiles, launched by Super-Harriers flown by RNR pilots off the back of P2000s in the Falklands against supertankers hijacked by Argentinian penguin terrorists...
    it will still be shite unless their ejector seat has an SLR strapped to it!
    sunnoficarus likes this.
    Brace up, show the movement!

  8. #38
    Senior Member alfred_the_great's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    2,483
    super-cavitating torpedos were designed for a specific scenario; one that didn't include surface ships.
    "In war the loser deserves to lose because his defeat must result from errors of thinking, made either before or during the conflict" Gen Andre Beaufre

  9. #39
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    6,524
    So, the French invent or develop something rather good. Next stop: Argentina.

  10. #40
    Senior Member Ancient_Mariner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    5,745
    Quote Originally Posted by IndependentBoffin View Post
    Actually come to think of it the easiest way to achieve a missile/torpedo hybrid without having to fiddle with getting the geometry and nosecone profile simultaneously right for air/aquatic travel is to have something like a UAV-torpedo hybrid.
    It would need a cool name like "IKARA".
    ArRSe is the Hotel California - You can log-out any time you like, but you can never leave!

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •