Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

Join ARRSE (free) to join in and remove this advertising

Page 3 of 10 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Like Tree19Likes
Discuss US floats nuclear subs option for Australia in Current Affairs, News and Analysis on The Army Rumour Service; Originally Posted by Rayc Things are hotting up in the Pacific rim. US is to have a base in Darwin. And recently there was a standoff with the Philippines and China. Apart from the problems ...
  1. #21
    Member twony's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    71
    Quote Originally Posted by Rayc View Post
    Things are hotting up in the Pacific rim.

    US is to have a base in Darwin.

    And recently there was a standoff with the Philippines and China.

    Apart from the problems of Vietnam and China.

    One wonders what is the endgame.
    Did you actually read the article? Particularly the last sentence?

    Quote Originally Posted by sunnoficarus View Post
    “All options are being considered other than nuclear propulsion which the government has ruled out.”
    There's more to this story than the basic facts described ( facts which you seemed to have ignored/ misunderstood) but it's got f all to do with China, Vietnam or the Philippines

    Pathetic article, from a publication (Australian Financial Review) which shouldn't have any interest in Defence matters anyway.

    Totally ignores the two most obvious issues, described well below.

    Quote Originally Posted by AndyPipkin View Post
    Running a fleet of SSN's requires more than just a few jetties. There are facilities and associated costs related to managing and disposing of nuclear reactors which go far beyond those required for SSK's. Almost certainly a non-started for Oz unless they fully bought into the USN support system. .
    Quote Originally Posted by Petardier View Post
    Ha, there's no support for SSNs in Australia, the politics are totally against it. There is also no nuclear industry or other infrastucture apart from a small reactor used to produce medical isotopes. Then there's the question of where to base them, Fleet Base East = Sydney! SSNs in Sydney Harbour, a guarantee for the party supporting it to lose most NSW seats in Federal parliament, megabrave decision minister. Great joke only a mentally retarded spam in Washington totally out of touch with Aust political reality could have dreamt that one up.
    Anything involving the word nuclear, is "on the agenda" of the Australian press, due to the current attitude and actions of Australian political parties, in regards to, domestic issues. Not sure if that sentence makes sense, but i can' t be fucked expanding on it, or discussing Australian domestic politics further. But, I will say this story is bullshit, is (possibly deliberately) designed to be misinterperated by non Australians not familiar with the Australian domestic politics.

    Quote Originally Posted by sunnoficarus View Post
    I think you'll find they will want an off the shelf turnkey solution this time.
    As far as I'm aware, at the present time, the plan is that Australia's new submarines will be designed and constructed in Australia.
    Toptotty likes this.

  2. #22
    Senior Member sunnoficarus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Sailing to Byzantium
    Posts
    12,529
    Quote Originally Posted by twony View Post
    As far as I'm aware, at the present time, the plan is that Australia's new submarines will be designed and constructed in Australia.
    'Designed and built in Australia' does not in any way preclude Australia basing the Collins replacements on a proven and low risk turnkey design from someone like Navantia who have very close ties with Electric Boat. Astute Class SSN's are 'designed and built in Britain', but have extensive EB design input.
    Warning, this post contains some flash photography.

  3. #23
    Senior Member Yeoman_dai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Here and there... you know
    Posts
    1,712
    Just buy the Germans Dolphin Class. Great little boats.
    Toptotty and sunnoficarus like this.
    RAC(TA) - 2006-2009
    Royal Navy - 2009 +

    Sir Walter Raleigh declared in the early 17th century that "whoever commands the sea, commands the trade; whosoever commands the trade of the world commands the riches of the world, and consequently the world itself." This principle is as true today as when uttered, and its effect will continue as long as ships traverse the seas."

  4. #24
    Oxygen Thief Dashing_Chap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    3,114
    Images
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Pyianno View Post
    Why don't they just buy one off us?
    Ask Canada.
    For where thou art, there is the world itself, and where thou art not, desolation.

  5. #25
    Senior Member littlejim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,350
    Images
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by sunnoficarus View Post
    Apart from any other issues, the journals and their talk of the RAN going nuclear forget one very crucial thing..... Manpower.

    The RAN has barely enough people to keep 2~3 Collins boats operational, and they have small crews of 58 that don't need kettle watchers. A Virginia Class SSN has a crew of 135.
    We'd better send out the press gangs then because we've got two 27,000 tonne carrier/assault ships being built in Spain. Somebody is going to have to swab the decks and move the Harrier around.
    The Pilbara Regt -- free ranging fowl fighters

    http://www.defence.gov.au/army/PILBARA/Welcome.asp

  6. #26
    Senior Member jimmys_best_mate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    11,695
    Quote Originally Posted by Dashing_Chap View Post
    Ask Canada.
    Wasn't that Canada's fault for dicking round while they slowly rotted in Portsmouth then trying to get them to work with US weapons and UK firecontrol systems to save the expense of buying UK weapons?
    jim30, Yeoman_dai and redshift like this.

  7. #27
    Senior Member Honky Tonk Donk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    617
    Quote Originally Posted by sunnoficarus View Post
    Apart from any other issues, the journals and their talk of the RAN going nuclear forget one very crucial thing..... Manpower.

    The RAN has barely enough people to keep 2~3 Collins boats operational, and they have small crews of 58 that don't need kettle watchers. A Virginia Class SSN has a crew of 135.
    They could start by poaching RN talent. I'm sure the RAN could quite easily knock together an attractive package that would have the required number of RN blokes heading Down Under to crew Oz Boats.
    "The browning is jammed. I am saying 'driver advance' on the "A" set and the driver, who can't hear me, is reversing. And as I look over the top of the turret and see twelve enemy tanks fifty yards away, someone hands me a cheese sandwich.".......British Tankie, N. Africa, WW2.

    “Gentlemen, in spite of your excellent training and orders, do not be daunted if chaos reigns. It undoubtedly will.”.......Brigadier Hill, 6th Airborne Div.

  8. #28
    Senior Member sunnoficarus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Sailing to Byzantium
    Posts
    12,529
    Quote Originally Posted by Honky Tonk Donk View Post
    They could start by poaching RN talent. I'm sure the RAN could quite easily knock together an attractive package that would have the required number of RN blokes heading Down Under to crew Oz Boats.
    It's not as if the R N is overmanned with submariners.
    Warning, this post contains some flash photography.

  9. #29
    Junior Member wakatoa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Indonesia
    Posts
    21
    Probably no chance of Skippy ever getting SSN's, this is probably part of a softening up process that will lead to Elmer having a couple based out of Darwin, Indonesia is having more subs built as we speak as are other SEA nations. I am sure Ivan is helping the Indos in the background with subs as they are with the Sukhoi's, this will make them a credible threat as long as the sub Ivans stay off the bathtub grog that killed some of the Sukhoi Ivans.
    I think Elmer has become rather cross with Skippy and the Collins problems and its gone a little beyond "do try to keep up old chap". There are three situations I can think of right now in SEA that could go off - Phil v China, Indo v Malaysia, Indo internal West Papua where Elmer has the largest copper and gold mine in the world.

  10. #30
    Senior Member baboon6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Johannesburg, South Africa
    Posts
    2,343
    Quote Originally Posted by Honky Tonk Donk View Post
    They could start by poaching RN talent. I'm sure the RAN could quite easily knock together an attractive package that would have the required number of RN blokes heading Down Under to crew Oz Boats.
    Aren't they already doing that to an extent?

Page 3 of 10 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •