ARmy Rumour SErvice

Originally Posted by jarrod248

They tend to have less diesel pumps?

As usual you are wrong.

Originally Posted by Arters

I will admit that you are exempt from Tachograph usage when driving Military Vehs.
but they won't be driving Mil. Vehs will they, it will need the Govt. to approve
the lack of Tachograph usage and the RTD.

We don't use Tachos in civilian (MT owned or hired in) vehicles either.

Well as one who has spent all day providing various HQ's with exactly the same information in completely different formats, I can say that I am slightly in the loop and some of the inevitable guess work on here is rather amusing

The only conclusion I make so far is thank goodness we spent millions on MIS such as JAMES so the whole world can continue with EXCEL spreadsheets

Originally Posted by 1001Tossers

As usual you are wrong.

As usual you are a cunt.

Originally Posted by JoeyDeacon

As usual you are a genius.

You really do need a technician to give you a new Brain Cell.

Originally Posted by 1001Tossers

You really do need a technician to give you a new Brain Cell.

If there was ever an example of someone needing the pill.....it was your mum.

Originally Posted by jimmys_best_mate

We don't use Tachos in civilian (MT owned or hired in) vehicles either.

They are not your Vehicles or hired, they are ours.

Arters, are you by any chance a fuel tanker driver. I do not think you should confuse what wincanton etc want to do with what the govt will require them to do. Driving trucks and delivering fuel? No issue. Not using tachographs? No issue. Using trucks owned by employers? No issue. If in national interest, will be requisitioned. Or companies reminded how licensing and authorisation works.

Do you think a fuel strike will have any public support? It is about fuel drivers pay, not safety and not tax on fuel. They will be 'the baddies' Cameron will break the strike and the Army will be seen as just doing as told.