Useful

**AFA06** · 12-02-2010, 16:20

Is anyone in the least surprised by this?

**Herrumph** · 12-02-2010, 18:40

1x crotchetty old pay warrant officer would do the trick surely. Back it up with passed over, bitter JNCO with a hatred of MPs and you could guarantee not a single dodgy claim ever got through.

One simple command would be required "Prove to me that this expense was essential to the service of your electorate sir"

**Gadgwah** · 12-02-2010, 19:02

Hang on I have to do my own expenses and that is then approved, and handled by an accounts section of 5 for a company of over 250, Where the phuc do these cnuts get off on this.
It completely beggars belief, but think!!!! no way will another MP get roasted for a duck house as it will have been approved by the "organisation" set up to combat the "fraud", (can I use that word as so little of them are getting prosecuted over the expenses farce.)
What's the betting that they will still claim for all the stuff you and I have to pay for out of our salary, only this time, it will be iron clad.
Fuming, I am phucking incandescent

Gadge

**jagman** · 12-02-2010, 19:36

This is a joke. Whatsmore, its not even a funny fooking joke.

**Wordsmith** · 12-02-2010, 20:27

Once upon a time MP's had enough integrity to be called 'honourable members'.

And if they still had integrity, it would only take a very small department to review and approve their expenses.

However, as they're now a lot of thieving spiv's, it looks like it'll take major manpower to keep their fingers out of the till.

Wordsmith.

**canteen_cowboy** · 12-02-2010, 20:36

Originally Posted by Proper_Gander

spend 6.6 million to make sure the MP's don't claim unnecessary expenses of, altogether, 1.1 million? makes perfect sense that

i think you will find the annual MP's expense bill was roughly £92 million for 2008 that includes all legitimate claims though

edited to add sourced from Here and other places