Discuss The SA80 "under fire" again at the Current Affairs, News and Analysis forum within the The Army Rumour Service website; Originally Posted by Recce19
Originally Posted by Geordie_Blerk
I'm looking forward to the input from ...
I'm looking forward to the input from the usal posters on the Shooting forum. They will spout endless drivel about the SLR being a manstopper and the A2 rifle not being fit for purpose. The irony being that they have not fired either rifle for "real".
No you're right, the SLR has never been fired in anger.
I'm looking forward to the input from the usal posters on the Shooting forum. They will spout endless drivel about the SLR being a manstopper and the A2 rifle not being fit for purpose. The irony being that they have not fired either rifle for "real".
No you're right, the SLR has never been fired in anger.
what about ireland and the falklands?? :S
Jeeeeesus 'H' f*cking Chriiiiist, was 'breeder of thick c*nts' written in the 'Fathers Employment' box on your birth certificate ?
I'm looking forward to the input from the usal posters on the Shooting forum. They will spout endless drivel about the SLR being a manstopper and the A2 rifle not being fit for purpose. The irony being that they have not fired either rifle for "real".
No you're right, the SLR has never been fired in anger.
I'm looking forward to the input from the usal posters on the Shooting forum. They will spout endless drivel about the SLR being a manstopper and the A2 rifle not being fit for purpose. The irony being that they have not fired either rifle for "real".
No you're right, the SLR has never been fired in anger.
what about ireland and the falklands?? :S
That rolling-eye's smiley sometimes denotes sardonic humour. IOW, he's taking the pish out of the post above.
Taliban marksmen use powerful 7.62mm ammo for their AK47 machine guns, ..... Only one in four British, US and German troops has been issued with guns using 7.62mm ammunition.
Lets ignore the fact that 7.62 soviet is a totally different round to 7.62 NATO shall we.
It isn't even 7.62mm. In fact the bullet diameter of 7.62 NATO isn't for that matter! :D
I'm looking forward to the input from the usal posters on the Shooting forum. They will spout endless drivel about the SLR being a manstopper and the A2 rifle not being fit for purpose. The irony being that they have not fired either rifle for "real".
No you're right, the SLR has never been fired in anger.
what about ireland and the falklands?? :S
Jeeeeesus 'H' f*cking Chriiiiist, was 'breeder of thick c*nts' written in the 'Fathers Employment' box on your birth certificate ?
I'm looking forward to the input from the usal posters on the Shooting forum. They will spout endless drivel about the SLR being a manstopper and the A2 rifle not being fit for purpose. The irony being that they have not fired either rifle for "real".
No you're right, the SLR has never been fired in anger.
what about ireland and the falklands?? :S
Jeeeeesus 'H' f*cking Chriiiiist, was 'breeder of thick c*nts' written in the 'Fathers Employment' box on your birth certificate ?
wtf?
For the first time since I ripped my toenail out on the garage door I am utterly speechless........
The Gov's current stand on defence spending makes this a redundant argument anyway! Everybody will be reduced to looking hard and yelling "bang, bang, bang" within the next year or two! Exceptions to the rule will be those armed with heavy machine guns who should adopt a more threatening outburst of.... "budda, budda, budda"!
please see my previous thread on throwing cylumes as tracer!
At the risk of being repetitive - or controversial - if you're going to suggest bringing back the SLR why not go the whole hog and revive the Lee-Enfield Mk4 .303?
I was out-gunned in Aden, by at least 250 yards, when using the SLR by the locals using WWII .303s. :(
The 5.56 Armalites we used in Borneo were OK (I've never seen a human/5.56 collision but they certainly worked on crocs, pigs and water buffalo), but most of the time the 12 bore Remington was preferred...
Bookmarks