-
13-07-2009, 10:33 #16
Re: It's poppycock to grow crops here but destroy them in Afghan
Seemingly not, then I did say I didn't know the answer. I do think we are going in the right direction with drug users though. The service I manage has recently started a service for younger people. The adult drug users often say they started using when they were 13 yrs old and upwards.
Originally Posted by msr
I'm not sure whether it will be a sad day or a time to rejoice when I write my first prescription so a kid can collect his/her Methadone and then catch the bus to school.And hence one master passion in the breast, like Aaron's serpent swallows up the rest.
-
13-07-2009, 10:39 #17
Re: It's poppycock to grow crops here but destroy them in Af
Why not kill every heroin addict on the planet. Hey presto! No more market for opium! It's not as if heroin addicts deserve to live.
-
13-07-2009, 10:39 #18
Re: It's poppycock to grow crops here but destroy them in Afghan
turning to the taliban is not the problem, as has been pointed out unless we threatened to do them serious harm the farmers will always work for the talib as all the money in the world from us will not stop the taliban doing nasty stuff to them/families etc. we cant protect them 24/7 and we wont be there forever, I dont blame them from taking the safer option.
-
13-07-2009, 10:41 #19
Re: It's poppycock to grow crops here but destroy them in Af
Thailand shot hundreds of Heroin users, guess what it didn't work. The PM who was ousted ? Thaksin shinawatra ordered it.
Originally Posted by Fallschirmjager
And hence one master passion in the breast, like Aaron's serpent swallows up the rest.
-
13-07-2009, 10:42 #20
Re: It's poppycock to grow crops here but destroy them in Afghan
Buy the whole crop, use what we need for medical purposes, then distroy the rest. While I could care less about junkies, the crimes they commit to fund their pathetic "lifestyle" harm real people. I'm willing to bet that buying up the Afghan poppy crop would cost less than what we spend on dealing with drug related crime.
Once we have stopped the flow of heroin, we can start to wean the junkies off methadon; the scum will not be able to go back on heroin since there won't be any left.Democracy is not for the people.
-
13-07-2009, 10:43 #21
Re: It's poppycock to grow crops here but destroy them in Afghan
This idea is more about solving the problems in Afghanistan, not directly solving the problem of drug abuse in the UK.
‘Good God!’ he laughed, and slowly filled his pipe,
Wondering ‘why he always talked such tripe’.
-
13-07-2009, 10:44 #22
Re: It's poppycock to grow crops here but destroy them in Af
Well it didn't make it worse though, did it?
Originally Posted by jarrod248
"Remember that you are an Englishman, and have consequently won first prize in the lottery of life".
Cecil Rhodes
-
13-07-2009, 10:45 #23
Re: It's poppycock to grow crops here but destroy them in Afghan
No but Heroin use is why we have people making loads of money out of poppy production.
Originally Posted by msr
And hence one master passion in the breast, like Aaron's serpent swallows up the rest.
-
13-07-2009, 10:46 #24
Re: It's poppycock to grow crops here but destroy them in Afghan
Only they aren't, because there is very little money to be made from growing it. The real money is made by the people who transport it and sell it on.
Originally Posted by jarrod248
MSR‘Good God!’ he laughed, and slowly filled his pipe,
Wondering ‘why he always talked such tripe’.
-
13-07-2009, 10:47 #25
Re: It's poppycock to grow crops here but destroy them in Afghan
I think the estimate is that for every £ spent on drug treatment we save £8 on criminal justice.
Originally Posted by Werewolf
And hence one master passion in the breast, like Aaron's serpent swallows up the rest.
-
13-07-2009, 10:47 #26
Re: It's poppycock to grow crops here but destroy them in Af
That was the problem. Shooting hundreds is no good. You have to kill all of them for it to work.
Originally Posted by jarrod248
It will solve the problem that there would be no market for their opium, hence no funding.
Originally Posted by msr
-
13-07-2009, 10:49 #27
Re: It's poppycock to grow crops here but destroy them in Afghan
I agree the farmers must be paid very little but more than what they'd get for other crops I imagine. the poppy does of course grow well there.
Originally Posted by msr
And hence one master passion in the breast, like Aaron's serpent swallows up the rest.
-
13-07-2009, 10:54 #28
Re: It's poppycock to grow crops here but destroy them in Afghan
Exactly, so let's start thinking intelligently about this ;)
Originally Posted by jarrod248
MSR‘Good God!’ he laughed, and slowly filled his pipe,
Wondering ‘why he always talked such tripe’.
-
13-07-2009, 10:56 #29
Re: It's poppycock to grow crops here but destroy them in Afghan
Permission to speak freely, Boss? To be honest, I could'nt give a fcuk if every Afghan man, woman and child dropped dead. Our priorities MUST be to protect British soldiers and civlilians.
Originally Posted by msr
If offering the Afghan poppy farmers a viable alternative to selling heroin and co-operating with Terry saves British soldiers and/or reduces drug related crime in the UK, then I'm all for it. If using the tactics of Alexander the Great - basically, slaughter every Afghan man, woman, child or goat who even looks the wrong way at your soldiers - was a viable option, I would not hesitate to advocate that too.
Democracy is not for the people.
-
13-07-2009, 10:58 #30
Re: It's poppycock to grow crops here but destroy them in Afghan
How much money (A) did the Afghan Government extort from us last year? Yes, I know what word I used, and that describes it best.
Now, how much money (B) would it take to buy as much of the harvest as we could?
How does A compare with B?He had bought a large map representing the sea,
Without the least vestige of land:
And the crew were much pleased when they found it to be
A map they could all understand.
-


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




Reply With Quote




In the





Bookmarks