Page 2 of 25 First 123412 ... Last
Results 16 to 30 of 370
  1. #16
    Senior Member Yeoman_dai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Here and there... you know
    Posts
    1,079

    Re: 'More helicopters are not the answer in Afghanistan'

    Ah ha, but a Mastiff costs around £200 000 each...

    Lets see, helicopter wise you could get an R22 for that!




    Or, to put it another way, 1/100th of a single Merlin.


    All of which is very attractive to HM Treasury, and PM because they can say 'look, we're buying all this impressive kit that the Army needs' whilst actually dodging a very expensive bullet. Bwastards

  2. #17
    Senior Member tropper66's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Isca
    Posts
    8,449

    Re: 'More helicopters are not the answer in Afghanistan'

    Do what the Canadians did, Hire the Airframes with crew from a former Soviet Republic
    And to think, I had no Idea I could bring so much fun and frivolity to others

    There are two types of people that dislike me,
    the envious and the stupid

    HAPPY NOW

  3. #18
    Senior Member para_medic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,402

    Re: 'More helicopters are not the answer in Afghanistan'

    Quote Originally Posted by Oil_Slick
    The only Euros with a good number of helos are the Germans. They have shitloads of CH-53's but won't play with the rough boys so they're as much use as tits on a bull.
    O_S, nope. The Germans had 12 (twelve) CH-53GS beginning of 2008 and 6 were flying out of Mazar. I am not aware of them reinforcing any of the CH-53G so - they have even less.
    "If there is one thing worse than a murderer it's a dirty rotten stinking grass... and that goes for litterbugs as well."

  4. #19
    Senior Member baboon6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Johannesburg, South Africa
    Posts
    1,509

    Re: 'More helicopters are not the answer in Afghanistan'

    Quote Originally Posted by tropper66
    Quote Originally Posted by tattybadger
    Quote Originally Posted by Fallschirmjager
    Helicopters aren't the answer to Afghanistan though they will go a long way in helping us achieve our mission there.
    Probably with reduced cas.

    For years ptling in S. Armagh was on foot or by heli iot reduce the threat of IEDs - surely that lesson has not been lost on the keepers of the purse string?


    Or do they give a fuck?
    How many Helcopters were in Ulster?, My sqn had 12 recce Sioux, backed up with 6 Scouts, and 2 sqn of Wessex/ Puma. 30/ 40 airframes. At a push there were also 2 sqn of RN in BK in 1970 that could be called upon
    How many are there in Helmond? 8 apache, 8 Chinook and some Lynx 20/30 airframes

    In an area , how much larger than Ulster?

    And they say they have enough
    As far as I know 8 Chinook, 6 Sea King, 8 Apache, 5 Lynx.

  5. #20
    Senior Member Pit_Bull's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    From Midlands, now living in Prague.
    Posts
    280

    Re: 'More helicopters are not the answer in Afghanistan'

    Quote Originally Posted by ChunkeyKnob
    or will we have another debacle like the SF chinooks from a few years ago?
    Are they still in the hanger awaiting config. or whatever was holding them back?? Or have they actually been released into service (unlikely I imagine).

  6. #21
    Senior Member tropper66's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Isca
    Posts
    8,449

    Re: 'More helicopters are not the answer in Afghanistan'

    Quote Originally Posted by baboon6
    Quote Originally Posted by tropper66
    Quote Originally Posted by tattybadger
    Quote Originally Posted by Fallschirmjager
    Helicopters aren't the answer to Afghanistan though they will go a long way in helping us achieve our mission there.
    Probably with reduced cas.

    For years ptling in S. Armagh was on foot or by heli iot reduce the threat of IEDs - surely that lesson has not been lost on the keepers of the purse string?


    Or do they give a fuck?
    How many Helcopters were in Ulster?, My sqn had 12 recce Sioux, backed up with 6 Scouts, and 2 sqn of Wessex/ Puma. 30/ 40 airframes. At a push there were also 2 sqn of RN in BK in 1970 that could be called upon
    How many are there in Helmond? 8 apache, 8 Chinook and some Lynx 20/30 airframes

    In an area , how much larger than Ulster?

    And they say they have enough
    As far as I know 8 Chinook, 6 Sea King, 8 Apache, 5 Lynx.
    So you can reduce that by 1/3 for servicing,ect it's a joke, some of these types are not much cop in Hot and High places, as they wear meant to operate at sea level
    And to think, I had no Idea I could bring so much fun and frivolity to others

    There are two types of people that dislike me,
    the envious and the stupid

    HAPPY NOW

  7. #22
    Senior Member The_Cheat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1,576

    Re: 'More helicopters are not the answer in Afghanistan'

    Quote Originally Posted by para_medic
    Quote Originally Posted by Oil_Slick
    The only Euros with a good number of helos are the Germans. They have shitloads of CH-53's but won't play with the rough boys so they're as much use as tits on a bull.
    O_S, nope. The Germans had 12 (twelve) CH-53GS beginning of 2008 and 6 were flying out of Mazar. I am not aware of them reinforcing any of the CH-53G so - they have even less.
    The wiki / Flight international says that the Germans had 96 as of November 2008.

    Can't find the Flight international link though...

    T C

    Edit to add- They signed a deal to have 26 of their CH-53's "upgraded to perform personnel recovery tasks" at the Paris air show. Linky

    Edit again- The German Army wiki page lists 96 CH-53, soon to be augmented with 80 NHI NH90.
    Quis Separabit

  8. #23
    Senior Member Semper_Flexibilis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    6,429

    Re: 'More helicopters are not the answer in Afghanistan'

    Quote Originally Posted by para_medic
    Quote Originally Posted by Oil_Slick
    The only Euros with a good number of helos are the Germans. They have shitloads of CH-53's but won't play with the rough boys so they're as much use as tits on a bull.
    O_S, nope. The Germans had 12 (twelve) CH-53GS beginning of 2008 and 6 were flying out of Mazar. I am not aware of them reinforcing any of the CH-53G so - they have even less.

    The German Army have a total of 82 operational CH-53's in their inventory

    65 CH-53G
    15 CH-53GS

    As per my point, the Germans have the largest fleet of heavy lift helos in the EU.
    Think of a herd of cats briefly all moving in the same direction due to a random quantum fluctuation...


    "It costs money to have children...if you don't have any....then don't have them. It is THAT simple. " - Mr_Deputy

  9. #24
    Senior Member baboon6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Johannesburg, South Africa
    Posts
    1,509

    Re: 'More helicopters are not the answer in Afghanistan'

    Quote Originally Posted by The_Cheat
    Quote Originally Posted by para_medic
    Quote Originally Posted by Oil_Slick
    The only Euros with a good number of helos are the Germans. They have shitloads of CH-53's but won't play with the rough boys so they're as much use as tits on a bull.
    O_S, nope. The Germans had 12 (twelve) CH-53GS beginning of 2008 and 6 were flying out of Mazar. I am not aware of them reinforcing any of the CH-53G so - they have even less.
    The wiki / Flight international says that the Germans had 96 as of November 2008.

    Can't find the Flight international link though...

    T C
    You mean 96 in service, mostly in Germany. He means 12 in Afghanistan.

  10. #25
    Senior Member The_Cheat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1,576

    Re: 'More helicopters are not the answer in Afghanistan'

    Quote Originally Posted by baboon6
    You mean 96 in service, mostly in Germany. He means 12 in Afghanistan.
    I think that's the point. If Germany wants to be a player in NATO then they need to have more than 12.5% of their Airframes involved.

    T C
    Quis Separabit

  11. #26
    Senior Member Fallschirmjager's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    TQ7480015495
    Posts
    8,216

    Re: 'More helicopters are not the answer in Afghanistan'

    Quote Originally Posted by Schaden
    Quote Originally Posted by Fallschirmjager
    Hence why I said they will go a long way in helping us achieve our mission there?
    Just explain exactly what that mission is please.
    To kill and maim as many taliban as possible with the weapons at my disposal.

    That's my mission and the only one i'm bothered about.

  12. #27
    Senior Member 81cufc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    615

    Re: 'More helicopters are not the answer in Afghanistan'

    Quote Originally Posted by Fallschirmjager
    Quote Originally Posted by Schaden
    Just explain exactly what that mission is please.
    To kill and maim as many taliban as possible with the weapons at my disposal.

    That's my mission and the only one i'm bothered about.
    Yeah Man! You should be in charge!

    Quote Originally Posted by Fallschirmjager
    Helicopters aren't the answer to Afghanistan though they will go a long way in helping us achieve our mission there.
    Agree!

    Quote Originally Posted by tattybadger
    Or do they give a fuck?
    I think you've hit the nail squarely on the head here!
    The Views of this person don't necessarily represent those of his brain!

  13. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    11,410

    Re: 'More helicopters are not the answer in Afghanistan'

    Quote Originally Posted by The_Cheat
    Quote Originally Posted by baboon6
    You mean 96 in service, mostly in Germany. He means 12 in Afghanistan.
    I think that's the point. If Germany wants to be a player in NATO then they need to have more than 12.5% of their Airframes involved.

    T C
    Why?

  14. #29
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    66

    Re: 'More helicopters are not the answer in Afghanistan'

    Quote Originally Posted by tattybadger

    . . . . Or do they give a fuck?
    No.
    "Remember that there is a time to work and a time to play. The time to work is when you are being watched. " The Senior Major; 1915

    "Whenever we attack, they retreat. When we pound them with missiles and heavy artillery, they retreat even deeper. But when we stopped pounding, they pushed to the airport for propaganda purposes.'' Muhammad Saeed al-Sahhaf

  15. #30
    Senior Member Semper_Flexibilis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    6,429

    Re: 'More helicopters are not the answer in Afghanistan'

    Quote Originally Posted by whitecity
    Quote Originally Posted by The_Cheat
    Quote Originally Posted by baboon6
    You mean 96 in service, mostly in Germany. He means 12 in Afghanistan.
    I think that's the point. If Germany wants to be a player in NATO then they need to have more than 12.5% of their Airframes involved.

    T C
    Why?

    Because the One Eyed Cvnt said that our gallant allies were providing us with lift in Afghanistan, QED, no need for more UK Helos.

    UK operational heavy lift helos: 30 Chinooks - 8 deployed
    Geerman operational heavy lift helos - 82 CH-53's - 6 deployed but they only seem to fly if the natives are not being grumpy.
    Think of a herd of cats briefly all moving in the same direction due to a random quantum fluctuation...


    "It costs money to have children...if you don't have any....then don't have them. It is THAT simple. " - Mr_Deputy

Page 2 of 25 First 123412 ... Last

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
From arrse3.arrse.co.uk