-
13-07-2009, 09:42 #16
Re: 'More helicopters are not the answer in Afghanistan'
Ah ha, but a Mastiff costs around £200 000 each...
Lets see, helicopter wise you could get an R22 for that!

Or, to put it another way, 1/100th of a single Merlin.
All of which is very attractive to HM Treasury, and PM because they can say 'look, we're buying all this impressive kit that the Army needs' whilst actually dodging a very expensive bullet. Bwastards
-
13-07-2009, 09:55 #17
Re: 'More helicopters are not the answer in Afghanistan'
Do what the Canadians did, Hire the Airframes with crew from a former Soviet Republic
And to think, I had no Idea I could bring so much fun and frivolity to others
There are two types of people that dislike me,
the envious and the stupid
HAPPY NOW
-
13-07-2009, 10:01 #18
Re: 'More helicopters are not the answer in Afghanistan'
O_S, nope. The Germans had 12 (twelve) CH-53GS beginning of 2008 and 6 were flying out of Mazar. I am not aware of them reinforcing any of the CH-53G so - they have even less.
Originally Posted by Oil_Slick
"If there is one thing worse than a murderer it's a dirty rotten stinking grass... and that goes for litterbugs as well."
-
13-07-2009, 10:10 #19
Re: 'More helicopters are not the answer in Afghanistan'
As far as I know 8 Chinook, 6 Sea King, 8 Apache, 5 Lynx.
Originally Posted by tropper66
-
13-07-2009, 10:10 #20
Re: 'More helicopters are not the answer in Afghanistan'
Are they still in the hanger awaiting config. or whatever was holding them back?? Or have they actually been released into service (unlikely I imagine).
Originally Posted by ChunkeyKnob
-
13-07-2009, 10:19 #21
Re: 'More helicopters are not the answer in Afghanistan'
So you can reduce that by 1/3 for servicing,ect it's a joke, some of these types are not much cop in Hot and High places, as they wear meant to operate at sea level
Originally Posted by baboon6
And to think, I had no Idea I could bring so much fun and frivolity to others
There are two types of people that dislike me,
the envious and the stupid
HAPPY NOW
-
13-07-2009, 10:19 #22
Re: 'More helicopters are not the answer in Afghanistan'
The wiki / Flight international says that the Germans had 96 as of November 2008.
Originally Posted by para_medic
Can't find the Flight international link though...
T C
Edit to add- They signed a deal to have 26 of their CH-53's "upgraded to perform personnel recovery tasks" at the Paris air show. Linky
Edit again- The German Army wiki page lists 96 CH-53, soon to be augmented with 80 NHI NH90.Quis Separabit
-
13-07-2009, 10:22 #23
Re: 'More helicopters are not the answer in Afghanistan'
Originally Posted by para_medic
The German Army have a total of 82 operational CH-53's in their inventory
65 CH-53G
15 CH-53GS
As per my point, the Germans have the largest fleet of heavy lift helos in the EU.Think of a herd of cats briefly all moving in the same direction due to a random quantum fluctuation...
"It costs money to have children...if you don't have any....then don't have them. It is THAT simple. " - Mr_Deputy
-
13-07-2009, 10:22 #24
Re: 'More helicopters are not the answer in Afghanistan'
You mean 96 in service, mostly in Germany. He means 12 in Afghanistan.
Originally Posted by The_Cheat
-
13-07-2009, 10:35 #25
Re: 'More helicopters are not the answer in Afghanistan'
I think that's the point. If Germany wants to be a player in NATO then they need to have more than 12.5% of their Airframes involved.
Originally Posted by baboon6
T CQuis Separabit
-
13-07-2009, 10:35 #26
Re: 'More helicopters are not the answer in Afghanistan'
To kill and maim as many taliban as possible with the weapons at my disposal.
Originally Posted by Schaden
That's my mission and the only one i'm bothered about.
-
13-07-2009, 10:38 #27
Re: 'More helicopters are not the answer in Afghanistan'
Yeah Man! You should be in charge!
Originally Posted by Fallschirmjager
Agree!
Originally Posted by Fallschirmjager
I think you've hit the nail squarely on the head here!
Originally Posted by tattybadger
The Views of this person don't necessarily represent those of his brain!
-
13-07-2009, 10:49 #28Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Posts
- 11,410
Re: 'More helicopters are not the answer in Afghanistan'
Why?
Originally Posted by The_Cheat
-
13-07-2009, 11:09 #29Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Posts
- 66
Re: 'More helicopters are not the answer in Afghanistan'
No.
Originally Posted by tattybadger
"Remember that there is a time to work and a time to play. The time to work is when you are being watched. " The Senior Major; 1915
"Whenever we attack, they retreat. When we pound them with missiles and heavy artillery, they retreat even deeper. But when we stopped pounding, they pushed to the airport for propaganda purposes.'' Muhammad Saeed al-Sahhaf
-
13-07-2009, 11:11 #30
Re: 'More helicopters are not the answer in Afghanistan'
Originally Posted by whitecity
Because the One Eyed Cvnt said that our gallant allies were providing us with lift in Afghanistan, QED, no need for more UK Helos.
UK operational heavy lift helos: 30 Chinooks - 8 deployed
Geerman operational heavy lift helos - 82 CH-53's - 6 deployed but they only seem to fly if the natives are not being grumpy.Think of a herd of cats briefly all moving in the same direction due to a random quantum fluctuation...
"It costs money to have children...if you don't have any....then don't have them. It is THAT simple. " - Mr_Deputy
-


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




Reply With Quote








Bookmarks