Thread: D-Day snub to Queen
-
03-06-2009, 16:31 #301
Re: D-Day snub to Queen
Has anyone mentioned that the paps are saying Charlie boy 'ASKED' to be invited - so as to defuse a supposed diplomatic row? (I can't be arsed to read the thread) How humilliating if it is indeed correct....
The one - eyed laptop thrower should have ensured this debacle never made it to light. It seems that Slimey Sarkozy only relented when Uncle Obama asked him why we were not involved.
-
03-06-2009, 16:48 #302
Re: D-Day snub to Queen
He's got his wings up hasn't he ?
Originally Posted by RCT(V)
He should show them all up by jumping in full kit and strolling up to the podium to take his place
As to the BBC they seem to be using the Stephen E Ambrose version of the invasion which seems to start with 101AB and 82nd AB landing in France and kicking everything off
Perhaps someone should drop a copy of his other book Pegasus Bridge off to AuntieWe should remember the tremendous contribution of the Queen Mother to the war effort:
As the BBC pointed out, she 'bravely remained in London beside her husband' during the war.
This contrasts sharply with the actions of my grandfather who, on the declaration of war immediately left his wife and children and pissed off, first to France, then North Africa, Italy, France (again) and finally Germany.
The shame will always be with us.
-
03-06-2009, 16:52 #303
Re: D-Day snub to Queen
Why truth is a casualty of war in the battle of 'Obama Beach'
The D-Day anniversary has become a battleground with politicians accused of plotting to exclude the Queen. Nonsense, says John Lichfield: this so-called scandal has been a cock-up rather than a conspiracy
Tuesday, 2 June 2009
In the history of British bloody-mindedness, "Obama Beach" is one of the greatest calamities. Rarely have so many people been sent all verbal guns blazing into an all-out assault on a scandal whose basic facts have been so wilfully misrepresented.
False fact one: The French have "snubbed" the Queen by failing to invite her to celebrate the 65th anniversary of D-Day on Saturday. President Barack Obama and President Nicolas Sarkozy will attend an "international ceremony" but not the British/Canadian head of state.
False fact two: The British government, and diplomatic service, have behaved despicably because they failed to ensure that the Queen was sent an invitation by the French.
False fact three: The French government has traduced the memory of British and Canadian troops – more then half of the forces engaged on 6 June 1944 – by describing D-Day as "mainly a Franco-American affair."
None of these "facts" are true. The history of the celebrations of the 65th anniversary of D-Day is a history of cock-ups, false-starts and changed minds by the British Government (Obama Beach mirrors Omaha beach to that extent.)
But it is also a history of the winding-up of British public opinion. This heated and vacuous row has nothing to do with the British D-Day veterans themselves. Their views and interests are largely being ignored by those who claim to venerate them.
More at:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo...h-1694529.html
Things put in a perspective that most won't care about of course (hey, it's the Independent after all) but that is nevertheless worth knowing.
-
03-06-2009, 17:08 #304
Re: D-Day snub to Queen
Lets hope that the idiot is out on his ear soon. He has now been humiliated by this issue. No doubt the spiteful vindictive b'stard will blame the Queen and will want revenge. Stand by for No 10 briefing against the Palace.
Johny Gurkha is in his sights as well.A DEAD STATESMAN
I could not dig: I dared not rob:
Therefore I lied to please the mob.
Now all my lies are proved untrue
And I must face the men I slew.
What tale shall serve me here among
Mine angry and defrauded young?
Kipling: EPITAPHS 1914
-
03-06-2009, 17:10 #305
Re: D-Day snub to Queen
The piece starts to fall down about here:
So there's something to be said for denying many veterans, now at least 83 (unless they sneaked in under age) what could be their last chance to visit their fallen comrades, is there? Mmmmm....Fact four: There is no British official ceremony to match the event at Omaha Beach because the government is following the practise of successive governments, Labour and Tory. Big military commemorations should be relatively sparing or such events become so banal that public interest fades. Years ending in 10 yes; years ending in five no. There is something to be said for such a policy, if the government had only stuck to it. British D-Day veterans themselves understand the policy and broadly support it.
And why would HMQ have been 'justifably' criticised? Brown could have gone to Omaha and HMQ to one of the UK veterans' ceremonies easily enough (bar the security aspects - but it's not as though the French aren't robust on security threats - ask Greenpeace....).The upshot: Gordon Brown will attend these veteran-led ceremonies on Saturday. He also decided to attend the Franco-American ceremony at Omaha Beach. This was a mistake. It was his decision to go to the US-French ceremony, without the Queen, which made the event "international" and produced the barrage of sanctimonious disapproval last week.
Should the Queen have gone as a last-minute guest to a ceremony to celebrate American heroism on an "American" beach? If she had done so, she and the government would also have been criticised (and with more justification).
HMQ does not need to be accompanied by the PM, and putting the Head of State and the head of government at different locations, one UK/Canadian, one US would be quite appropriate as a display of commemorating allies, particularly, say, if we'd asked for Mrs Obama or Joe Biden or a prominent American to join the commemoration at Sword, Juno or Gold.
While the article is correct - and some days behind a number of posts here on this thread, I might add - in pointing out that the French shouldn't be blamed for this, from point four in the article onwards we get some limp apologia for a completely avoidable cock-up by No.10.
There was, actually, a British presence on Omaha in the form of an RAF Base Defence unit, by the way...
-
03-06-2009, 17:23 #306
Re: D-Day snub to Queen
There was also a French presence on Omaha in the form of a lone Frenchman from the Free French 2nd Armoured Division attached to the US 18th Infantry Regiment as a German translator. He is now 85 and there is an interview of him (in French) there
http://lemamouth.blogspot.com/
See "Omaha Jake"
-
03-06-2009, 17:35 #307
Re: D-Day snub to Queen
Clearly I would not wish to mock a veteran of D-Day but I think you are on a bit of a loser here. In the UK it is not considered clever to speak French therefore nobody here is going to be able to listen/understand your link.
Originally Posted by fantassin
Blair could speak very good French - 'nuff said.A DEAD STATESMAN
I could not dig: I dared not rob:
Therefore I lied to please the mob.
Now all my lies are proved untrue
And I must face the men I slew.
What tale shall serve me here among
Mine angry and defrauded young?
Kipling: EPITAPHS 1914
-
03-06-2009, 17:42 #308
Re: D-Day snub to Queen
The Queen can speak French, and rather better than most of her recent Prime Ministers could/can (Ted Heath, for instance).
-
05-06-2009, 19:32 #309Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Posts
- 2
Re: D-Day snub to Queen
I have had the misfortune to read, out of curiosity, all sixteen pages of this thread. I have never read such a load of old rubbish. I also get the impression that few of you have actually got you boots dirty, and if you have it was only during recruit training
-
05-06-2009, 19:35 #310Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Posts
- 9,353
Re: D-Day snub to Queen
Oh aye?
Originally Posted by Still_Stagging_On
If you don't like it, don't read it. Mind the door doesn't hit you on the way out.
-
06-06-2009, 08:31 #311
Re: D-Day snub to Queen
Hi Jagman
Thats a bit harsh, how would you know thats the case with those on the forum, why are you be seriousarse about it, if you dont like whats read practice what you preach on your own comments, tut! tut! shame on you.
Are you still serving if not do you still contribute, and what infantry reg were/are you
-
06-06-2009, 08:33 #312
Re: D-Day snub to Queen
I did 24 years - how about you cnut?
Originally Posted by Still_Stagging_On
Oh BTW - shut the door behind you!I'm the rootin'est, tootin'est........................
-
06-06-2009, 09:10 #313
Re: D-Day snub to Queen
Can't let the Crabs have all the credit for Omaha. The RN was going to be i/c unloading merchantmen on the beach (my gt uncle (on the Retired List!) was going to be in charge of it. He spent 3 days 'in a hole in the sand' waiting for it to happen. Eventually was i/c unloading at Rheims and got US Legion of Merit for it. Which two sentences are about all I could get out of him about it. He didn't know his son was a few miles up Channel off one of the othe rbeaches in the only RN warship to be knocked out (mined) on the day.
Dr Johnson: 'Any man thinks less of himself for not having been a soldier, or not having been to sea.'
Admiral of the Fleet Lord Fisher of Kilverstone: 'Moderation in war is imbecility!'
Douglas MacArthur: 'There is no substitute for Victory!'
-
06-06-2009, 14:24 #314
Re: D-Day snub to Queen
Well, having just listened to Browns speach I now know why the Boss's invite went 'astray'
A right 'political' spouting if I ever heard one from Brown while President Obama pretty much got it spot on and talked about D-Day and those that took part.Squaddies.... Lions led by political donkeys.
-
06-06-2009, 14:56 #315
Re: D-Day snub to Queen
Queen Not invited to Normandy celebrations mmm
Normandy or Derby Day? Difficult choice eh
-


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks



Reply With Quote











Bookmarks