Welcome to the Army Rumour Service, ARRSE

The UK's largest and busiest UNofficial military website.

Join ARRSE (free) to join in and remove this advertising

Page 1 of 10 123 ... LastLast
Like Tree39Likes
Discuss TATA Mini Cat, India's air car, on the streets in August in Cars, Bikes 'n AFVs on The Army Rumour Service; This looks Hi tech, would like to see more info. Anything that can be driven by steam can be driven by compressed air. To propel any distance, it would need compressed air at 3000 psi ...
  1. #1
    Senior Member maccabonga's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    405

    TATA Mini Cat, India's air car, on the streets in August

    This looks Hi tech, would like to see more info. Anything that can be driven by steam can be driven by compressed air. To propel any distance, it would need compressed air at 3000 psi for suitable volume storage reduced to a working pressure 120-150 psi.

    What is this? Will it be the next big thing? Tata Motors of India thinks so. What will the oil companies do to stop it?

    It is a car engine that runs on air. That's right; air not gas or diesel or electric but just the air around us.

    Tata Motors of India has scheduled the Air Car to hit Indian streets by August 2012

    The Air Car, developed by ex-Formula One engineer Guy N. For Luxembourg-based MDI, uses compressed air to push its engine's pistons and make the car go.

    The Air Car, called the "Mini CAT" could cost around 365,757 rupees in India or $8,177 US.

    The Mini CAT which is a simple, light urban car, with a tubular chassis, a body of fiberglass that is glued not welded and powered by compressed air.

    A Microprocessor is used to control all electrical functions of the car.

    One tiny radio transmitter sends instructions to the lights, indicators and every other electrical device on the car.

    The temperature of the clean air expelled by the exhaust pipe is between 0-15 degrees below zero, which makes it suitable for use by the internal air conditioning system with no need for gases or loss of power.

    There are no keys, just an access card which can be read by the car from your pocket.

    According to the designers, it costs less than 50 rupees per 70 miles, that's about a tenth the cost of a car running on petrol or diesel.

    The car has a top speed of 60 mph and would has a range of around 185 miles between refuels.

    Refilling the car will take place at adapted fuel stations with special air compressors.

    A fill up will only take two to three minutes and costs approximately 100 rupees

    This car can also be filled at home with it's on board compressor.

    It will take 3-4 hours to refill the tank, but it can be done while you sleep.

    Because there is no combustion engine, changing the 1 liter of vegetable oil is only necessary every 30,000 miles.

    Due to its simplicity, there is very little maintenance to be done on this car.

    This Air Car almost sounds too good to be true.

    We'll see in August. 2012
    maguire likes this.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Legs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Sitting in the office on my shiny backside, drinking a brew and surfing on ARRSE
    Posts
    6,744
    They may need to work on the looks before the European market accepts it~:

    Tata Motors enters second phase of air-car development

    Name:  mdi-air-car.jpg
Views: 919
Size:  25.8 KB
    Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, because you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup...

  3. #3
    Senior Member Rawhide's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    1,578
    If they can cut the top speed to 20 and make it spongy on the outside never mind the oil companies trying to stop it, what about all the Pikeys losing their dodgem car business?

    I think its great though, never mind the styling, i'd buy the missus one, the cost will offset my M3.
    I’ve heard that fact, that is you eat more than 6 bananas it will kill you.
    I saw a bowl with 7 bananas in it, and i thought, that’s dangerous.
    “The toilet is too far from the sink which isn’t what you need in India. Both are often required at the same time”

  4. #4
    Senior Member Azrael2006's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    613
    why be concerned on the looks when it potentially saves city commuters thousands of pounds each year? Also if its uber green then people will by it regardless.

    well done that man for thinking outside the box!

  5. #5
    Senior Member Cabana's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    9,065
    Images
    1
    You got to hand it to TATA, they are quite innovative. With oil prices only going up they may just be on to something with this. They just need to make it look a tad better...and not like a rickshaw.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Joe_Private's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    It's complicated
    Posts
    5,001
    I am struggling to see how this will be cheaper or more effective than a car with a traditional engine. Consider this:

    Compressed air is being used as stored energy.
    To store that energy, the air has to be compressed.
    To compress that air, an air compressor has to be run.
    To run that compressor, it has to be driven by an engine or an electric motor.
    If it is driven by an electric motor, that electricity has to be produced by some means, the most cost-effective way of which uses fossil fuels.
    There are losses associated with every step on the way, and at some point, fuel has to be burnt, or a more expensive way of generating electricity has to be used. How, therefore, can this possibly represent a saving of 90% in fuel costs?
    SuperSLime, DavidBOC and Mattb like this.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Cabana's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    9,065
    Images
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Joe_Private View Post
    I am struggling to see how this will be cheaper or more effective than a car with a traditional engine. Consider this:

    Compressed air is being used as stored energy.
    To store that energy, the air has to be compressed.
    To compress that air, an air compressor has to be run.
    To run that compressor, it has to be driven by an engine or an electric motor.
    If it is driven by an electric motor, that electricity has to be produced by some means, the most cost-effective way of which uses fossil fuels.
    There are losses associated with every step on the way, and at some point, fuel has to be burnt, or a more expensive way of generating electricity has to be used. How, therefore, can this possibly represent a saving of 90% in fuel costs?
    Well, I would imagine there is a hell of a lot more energy used to extract oil and then to refine it. Then to get the fuel to the petrol stations and to pump it into the car.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Joe_Private's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    It's complicated
    Posts
    5,001
    Quote Originally Posted by Cabana View Post
    Well, I would imagine there is a hell of a lot more energy used to extract oil and then to refine it. Then to get the fuel to the petrol stations and to pump it into the car.
    Either way, you will have losses, regardless of whether it is losses in the electrical distribution, or the energy needed to get the fuel to the point of use. Even if your generator is electrically driven, then the cheapest way of generating that electricity is using fossil fuel, and the energy used to extract refine and transport said fuel pretty much cancels out the energy used to extract refine and transport the fuel used in a traditional car.

  9. #9
    Senior Member 2/51's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Land of the Gordons
    Posts
    2,215
    Images
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Cabana View Post
    You got to hand it to TATA, they are quite innovative. With oil prices only going up they may just be on to something with this. They just need to make it look a tad better...and not like a rickshaw.

    Don't forget they bought Land Rover...who managed to increae fuel consumption in the Defender by putting in a newer engine! Genius

  10. #10
    Senior Member 2/51's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Land of the Gordons
    Posts
    2,215
    Images
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Joe_Private View Post
    How, therefore, can this possibly represent a saving of 90% in fuel costs?
    I am guessing that the 10% fuel required is to compress the air.

Page 1 of 10 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •