Page 1 of 14 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 134
Discuss The 'Brown Envelope' is replaced by the 'Brown email' at the Armed Forces Redundancy Scheme 2010 forum within the The Army Rumour Service website; In a nutshell on the 11th & 12th January 2011, 38 SNCO's recieved their 12 ...
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,148

    The 'Brown Envelope' is replaced by the 'Brown email'

    In a nutshell on the 11th & 12th January 2011, 38 SNCO's recieved their 12 months notice by a generic email. This email did not go through their respective Chain of Command (CoC), the SNCO's were told to inform their CoC. It has been said that this is yet another example of 'David Cameron's' lack of care and understanding of the armed forces. At least one of these SNCO's was serving in Afgahn at the time he recieved the email. The following link gives more details and the email that was sent out.

    http://www.arrse.co.uk/rhq-personnel...ot-freeze.html
    'No military pomp attended its birth or decease. It was not a famous regiment with glamour and whatnot, but born for war only and not for parades. From the moment of its formation it was kicking. It is with much sadness that I recall its disbandment in 1922; like old soldiers it simply faded away. 'so said former machine gunner George Coppard 'With a Machine Gun to Cambrai'

  2. #2
    Senior Member Auld-Yin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    In front of the fire, wearing slippers with a brew at hand.
    Posts
    10,525
    So, if the SNCOs don't tell their CoC then they can carry on jogging as normal? Somehow I don't think so.

    It is not a very good way to treat people who have given so much to the army. Remember the press uproar when some guy sacked his staff by text message? Not a lot of difference here and a distinct lack of cojones from some very senior officers. IMHO
    "Patience is counting down without blasting off."
    Author Unknown

  3. #3
    Senior Member BoundApprentice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    The Fens
    Posts
    641
    Delete the E mail deny getting it and then sue

  4. #4
    Senior Member 4(T)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    2,638
    Quote Originally Posted by BoundApprentice View Post
    Delete the E mail deny getting it and then sue
    Quite. Unless they were foolish enough to acknowledge receipt of the email, there is nothing to stop them simply deleting it and feigning ignorance.....

  5. #5
    Senior Member vampangua's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    617
    Don't quite see what DC had to do with this. Or are you suggesting he's attempting to run the manpower plot, not the country?

    [Wonders which is harder??]

  6. #6
    Senior Member dogmeat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    West Midlands
    Posts
    954
    Quote Originally Posted by 4(T) View Post
    there is nothing to stop them simply deleting it and feigning ignorance.....
    Apart from the mail server logs, you mean? Good call.
    " Quis autem vel eum iure reprehenderit qui in ea voluptate velit esse quam nihil molestiae consequatur, vel illum qui dolorem eum fugiat quo voluptas nulla pariatur?"

  7. #7
    Senior Member fatboy69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    374
    Quote Originally Posted by dogmeat View Post
    Apart from the mail server logs, you mean? Good call.
    Even if you opened it and a read receipt was sent, it still does not prove the recipient actually read the contents as many a company has found out in court.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,148
    Quote Originally Posted by vampangua View Post
    Don't quite see what DC had to do with this. Or are you suggesting he's attempting to run the manpower plot, not the country?

    [Wonders which is harder??]
    It shows his ignorance of the whole SDSR and that the he trust the 'suits' behind the closed doors in DM (A) in Land. But when HQ Land found out, they were outraged as well and they are in the same building as DM (A). It dosn't exactly fill you with confidence?
    'No military pomp attended its birth or decease. It was not a famous regiment with glamour and whatnot, but born for war only and not for parades. From the moment of its formation it was kicking. It is with much sadness that I recall its disbandment in 1922; like old soldiers it simply faded away. 'so said former machine gunner George Coppard 'With a Machine Gun to Cambrai'

  9. #9
    Senior Member Tytus_Barnowl's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,870
    Its like the old NOTACAS joke. "All those with mothers alive at home stand up, sit down Jones".
    You see! This is why birds and CID don't mix.
    You give a bloke a gun and he thinks its a dream come true
    You give a girl one and she knows it doesn't go with a dress.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    19,049
    Someone mentioned this the other day.

    On O type there are MCPs, where you can be given 12 months notice and your resettlement, but after 15 I beleive only redundancy can be used.

    They were under the impression that V type has the facility to MCP you at any point with 12 months notice.







    Never blow someone else's trumpet.

Page 1 of 14 12311 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •