The Army Rumour Service
Forum Index QM's - Clothing and Equipment


View unanswered posts
Printer Friendly Page
P: <  1, 2, 3 ... 33, 34, 35, 36, 37  >
Plus anything else G4!
Reply to topicReply to topic

Re: PECOC

Post Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 7:22 pm

The stable belt is dead, long live the velcro patch on each arm with as meny colourful badges as possible

Parky_boy
Old Salt
 
Posts: 195
Joined: Aug 17, 2007
Location: Getting my fat head down!
View user's profile
Reply to topicReply to topic

Re: PECOC

Post Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 7:26 pm

er..still belt on....Dress Regs old bean, dress Regs.. Smile

Erm and i was not slagging your gut tiger(is if i could)..i was talking about the amount we lost with the above kit on yer back...LOL

God your touchy this weather... Very Happy

swampmonster
LE (MIA)
 
Posts: 808
Joined: Nov 09, 2007
Location: In the swamp
View user's profile
Reply to topicReply to topic

Re: PECOC

Post Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 7:50 pm

swampmonster:

God your touchy this weather... Very Happy

PMT brought on by Christopher

tiger stacker
LE
 
Posts: 2473
Joined: Jun 04, 2004
View user's profile
Reply to topicReply to topic

Re: PECOC

Post Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 8:42 pm

kitmonster:
Thank god this is all out in the open now! As someone involved in the early days and seeing the childish in fighting that was in danger of breaking out (I can say that now I am out! ) I for one think the result is much better than it could have been. Sensible and pragmatic heads seem to have won the day up in Main Building. Good job all-round and its good to see that this is an evolution that can trace its data way back to the early days before CS 95.

Just to have my say in the few areas:

Tuck in or out? It will take a generational change in the higher ranks before this will happen. When you grew up in lightweights and KF shirts you cannot see past anything that is not based on that. I work now in North America and people think its eccentric but barking that the UK wears its shirts tucked in. The fact is that with such a wide range of sizes and shapes coupled to the fact that the uniforms are cut for combat not to fit like civvies means we always looked like a sack tied around the middle with a brightly coloured belt. And that’s in the morning when you walk in, by lunch time shirts are half in and out and most people have resorted to a t-shirt. The fact is that the shirt (Lightweight jacket actually) is not cut as a shirt to stay tucked in.

FR PECOC: The IPT in charge of the FR aircrew stuff was briefed up and were looking at keeping in line with PECOC. There may be a disconnect in timing because of existing stock and commitments to the old FR material. I was impressed by the people they had working on the uniforms from techies to users so I would predicate a good outcome once the inevitable FR colour problems have been overcome.

Made in China: The only first world countries actually making large quantities of textile garments within their own borders do so under the blanket of protectionism, like the US Berry Amendment. The result is that the US pays well over the odds for everything but it keeps jobs in the US, which is just about possible because of the large internal market. Most textile items that come out of the US which are destined for the non-US markets originate in China.

KM its nice to find someone else that think we make our troops look like a bag of spuds. I left before CS95 came in. So lightweigts and KF shirts and woolly pullys with stable belts were the order of the day. On exercise most of us wore jungle trousers, norgey shirts and fleeces. we also bought are own goretex waterproofs in case it rained. CS95 was a big improvement. I was hoping that PECOC would finally see the UK catch up with the rest of the world in this regard. From what I see now with the UBACS and Osprey we have made progress in the operational area. Do you know if there are plans to incorporate MTP in to the PECOC boots?

Salvador
LE (GCM, MIA)
 
Posts: 143
Joined: Nov 08, 2005
Location: Reading
View user's profile
Reply to topicReply to topic

Re: PECOC

Post Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 2:28 am

I have no insight as I'm not in the team. Gearspotter may illiminate. I would think its will not happen in the short term as there are all sorts of colour fastness, durability etc issues. But it can happen if there is a will, just not sure there is!

kitmonster
Moderator
 
Posts: 365
Joined: Nov 27, 2006
Location: The Frozen North
View user's profile
Reply to topicReply to topic

Re: PECOC

Post Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 3:16 am

Stable Belt is Not dead. Not only does it look good, it also gives us yet another chance to show off our regimental pride. Saying that I suppose not everyones stable belt is maroon!

para_sands
LE (MIA)
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Aug 31, 2009
Location: Somewhere Id rather not be otherwise I wouldnt be playing with my AARSE
View user's profile
Reply to topicReply to topic

Re: PECOC

Post Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 4:08 am

Whoever said of putting MTP into boots, look at the Canadian offering:

Do you really want something akin to this?

Black leather or suede desert boots would make far more sense if you ask me. Maybe brown or grey leather or nubuck, or similar, if you want to get away from black leather for NVG/IRR/daylight cam reasons.

Voltiguer
War Hero
 
Posts: 551
Joined: Dec 28, 2007
View user's profile
Reply to topicReply to topic

Re: PECOC

Post Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 8:34 am

If you make the issue boots in our specific camo you stop lads being able to buy their own to suit their feet, which would be s***.

BigRed99
Old Salt
 
Posts: 102
Joined: Apr 03, 2008
View user's profile
Reply to topicReply to topic

Re: PECOC

Post Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 2:48 pm

I have never seen the reason why people get such a stonk on about camo boots. If you are in the rear or a loggie the colour of your slappers is not a issue. If you do have to leave the FOB or the camp they will be covered in mud or dust after a couple of yards of walking.

saladdoger
LE (MIA)
 
Posts: 295
Joined: Jul 10, 2008
View user's profile
Reply to topicReply to topic

Re: PECOC

Post Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 4:11 pm

Brwon leather; lower visibility, and the polich has more wax so greater water repellance.

Bravo_Bravo
LE (GCM, MIA)
 
Posts: 7430
Joined: Jul 13, 2003
Location: Training Wing, 3 MI. ( not really )
View user's profile
Reply to topicReply to topic

Re: PECOC

Post Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 4:21 pm

Voltiguer:
Whoever said of putting MTP into boots, look at the Canadian offering:

Do you really want something akin to this?

Black leather or suede desert boots would make far more sense if you ask me. Maybe brown or grey leather or nubuck, or similar, if you want to get away from black leather for NVG/IRR/daylight cam reasons.

How do you find them when trying to put them on?

jumpinjarhead
LE
 
Posts: 3717
Joined: Jan 08, 2007
Location: North Georgia USA
View user's profile
Reply to topicReply to topic

Re: PECOC

Post Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 4:45 pm

Inbuilt strobe light.

I'm more concerned about the number of tins of polish needed to match...

Bravo_Bravo
LE (GCM, MIA)
 
Posts: 7430
Joined: Jul 13, 2003
Location: Training Wing, 3 MI. ( not really )
View user's profile
Reply to topicReply to topic

Re: PECOC

Post Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 5:18 pm

Bravo_Bravo:
Inbuilt strobe light.

I'm more concerned about the number of tins of polish needed to match...

Indeed and getting it on the laces in just the right combination is a bit of a bother. I assume the strobe also has a shield on it so that it is visible only to the dedicated overhead Predator for the automated downlink to CENTCOM for burst encrypted relay to the user with grid coordinates (to the nearest cm) of the errant boots.

jumpinjarhead
LE
 
Posts: 3717
Joined: Jan 08, 2007
Location: North Georgia USA
View user's profile
Reply to topicReply to topic

Re: PECOC

Post Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 7:25 pm

Voltiguer:
Whoever said of putting MTP into boots, look at the Canadian offering:

Do you really want something akin to this?

Black leather or suede desert boots would make far more sense if you ask me. Maybe brown or grey leather or nubuck, or similar, if you want to get away from black leather for NVG/IRR/daylight cam reasons.
Can just see that plastered with Kiwi!

llech
LE
 
Posts: 1200
Joined: Sep 07, 2009
Location: Land of my fathers
View user's profile
Reply to topicReply to topic

Re: PECOC

Post Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 8:58 pm

para_sands:
Stable Belt is Not dead. Not only does it look good, it also gives us yet another chance to show off our regimental pride. Saying that I suppose not everyones stable belt is maroon!

Good to see Bristol UOTC represented on this thread. Wellcome!

tearsbeforebedtime
LE (MIA)
 
Posts: 1326
Joined: Jan 22, 2005
Location: Errr. Wait Out. Who'se got the map guys...
View user's profile
Reply to topicReply to topic

Re: PECOC

Post Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 11:32 pm

tearsbeforebedtime:
para_sands:
Stable Belt is Not dead. Not only does it look good, it also gives us yet another chance to show off our regimental pride. Saying that I suppose not everyones stable belt is maroon!

Good to see Bristol UOTC represented on this thread. Wellcome!

On EBay as well geting rid of his gash!!! Good stuff!

shop.ebay.co.uk/para_sands/m.html

Dodgy-Engr
LE (GCM, MIA)
 
Posts: 282
Joined: Apr 29, 2005
View user's profile
Reply to topicReply to topic

Re: PECOC

Post Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:00 pm

Voltiguer:
Whoever said of putting MTP into boots, look at the Canadian offering:

Do you really want something akin to this?

Black leather or suede desert boots would make far more sense if you ask me. Maybe brown or grey leather or nubuck, or similar, if you want to get away from black leather for NVG/IRR/daylight cam reasons.
there good how about theses for the summer
  • infantry%20tactical%20boots%20bd7177.jpg
  • Description:
  • Filesize: 25.79 KB
  • Viewed: 29 Time(s)
  • infantry%20tactical%20boots%20bd7177.jpg

thecoops
Old Salt
 
Posts: 129
Joined: May 07, 2007
Location: s.e england
View user's profile
Reply to topicReply to topic

Re: PECOC

Post Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 3:52 pm

Apologies if this has already been explained but I've looked and can't see an answer.

Is MTP the same as Crye Multicam? In the Briefing Note it seemed to be saying it is the same but different. I've noticed that one or two splliers are now advertising British style kit in multicam and suggesting that its compatable.

BuggerAll
LE (MIA)
 
Posts: 3628
Joined: Nov 16, 2004
Location: Over the sea and not so far away!
View user's profile
Reply to topicReply to topic

Re: PECOC

Post Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 4:01 pm

It's the same colours, colour densities etc.. But the shapes are similar to the current DPM shapes as opposed to the more US woodland type shapes on multicam.

Bisley_Bob
Old Salt
 
Posts: 197
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
Location: Wiltshire
View user's profile
Reply to topicReply to topic

Re: PECOC

Post Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 7:17 pm

You won't see the difference on pouches. Where it will show is on large areas like on clothing and bergens.

Boris3098
Old Salt
 
Posts: 211
Joined: Mar 07, 2009
Location: Worcester
View user's profile Send e-mail
Page 34 of 37
P: <  1, 2, 3 ... 33, 34, 35, 36, 37  >

Jump to:  

Display posts from previous:   




All times are GMT




Colour my ARRSE:   
 | Home  | Sitemap  | Search  | Last 50  | Complain  | Contact  | Advertise  | Help!  | Kit Shop  | Navy Net  | Rear Party  | Jobs  | Yr Acct/Login  | Join ARRSE