Re: It's poppycock to grow crops here but destroy them in Afghan
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:43 am

msr

- Posts: 15023
- Joined: Jul 13, 2003
Re: It's poppycock to grow crops here but destroy them in Af
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:44 am
Thailand shot hundreds of Heroin users, guess what it didn't work. The PM who was ousted ? Thaksin shinawatra ordered it.
Well it didn't make it worse though, did it?

Ord_Sgt

- Posts: 7588
- Joined: Jul 13, 2003
Re: It's poppycock to grow crops here but destroy them in Afghan
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:45 am
No but Heroin use is why we have people making loads of money out of poppy production.

jarrod248

- Posts: 9234
- Joined: Jan 03, 2007
Re: It's poppycock to grow crops here but destroy them in Afghan
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:46 am
No but Heroin use is why we have people making loads of money out of poppy production.
Only they aren't, because there is very little money to be made from growing it. The real money is made by the people who transport it and sell it on.
msr

msr

- Posts: 15023
- Joined: Jul 13, 2003
Re: It's poppycock to grow crops here but destroy them in Afghan
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:47 am
Once we have stopped the flow of heroin, we can start to wean the junkies off methadon; the scum will not be able to go back on heroin since there won't be any left.
I think the estimate is that for every £ spent on drug treatment we save £8 on criminal justice.

jarrod248

- Posts: 9234
- Joined: Jan 03, 2007
Re: It's poppycock to grow crops here but destroy them in Af
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:47 am
Thailand shot hundreds of Heroin users, guess what it didn't work. The PM who was ousted ? Thaksin shinawatra ordered it.
That was the problem. Shooting hundreds is no good. You have to kill all of them for it to work.
This idea is more about solving the problems in Afghanistan, not directly solving the problem of drug abuse in the UK.
It will solve the problem that there would be no market for their opium, hence no funding.

Fallschirmjager
- Posts: 5706
- Joined: Feb 18, 2006
- Location: TQ74801549
Re: It's poppycock to grow crops here but destroy them in Afghan
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:49 am
No but Heroin use is why we have people making loads of money out of poppy production.
Only they aren't, because there is very little money to be made from growing it. The real money is made by the people who transport it and sell it on.
msr
I agree the farmers must be paid very little but more than what they'd get for other crops I imagine. the poppy does of course grow well there.

jarrod248

- Posts: 9234
- Joined: Jan 03, 2007
Re: It's poppycock to grow crops here but destroy them in Afghan
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:54 am
No but Heroin use is why we have people making loads of money out of poppy production.
Only they aren't, because there is very little money to be made from growing it. The real money is made by the people who transport it and sell it on.
msr
I agree the farmers must be paid very little but more than what they'd get for other crops I imagine. the poppy does of course grow well there.
Exactly, so let's start thinking intelligently about this
msr

msr

- Posts: 15023
- Joined: Jul 13, 2003
Re: It's poppycock to grow crops here but destroy them in Afghan
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:56 am
Permission to speak freely, Boss? To be honest, I could'nt give a fcuk if every Afghan man, woman and child dropped dead. Our priorities MUST be to protect British soldiers and civlilians.
If offering the Afghan poppy farmers a viable alternative to selling heroin and co-operating with Terry saves British soldiers and/or reduces drug related crime in the UK, then I'm all for it. If using the tactics of Alexander the Great - basically, slaughter every Afghan man, woman, child or goat who even looks the wrong way at your soldiers - was a viable option, I would not hesitate to advocate that too.

Werewolf
- Posts: 8515
- Joined: Jul 24, 2005
- Location: Slightly to the Right of Ghenghis Khan...
Re: It's poppycock to grow crops here but destroy them in Afghan
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:58 am
Now, how much money (B) would it take to buy as much of the harvest as we could?
How does A compare with B?

PartTimePongo
- Posts: 18594
- Joined: Jul 13, 2003
- Location: Rostov-on-Brum
Re: It's poppycock to grow crops here but destroy them in Afghan
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:58 am
Permission to speak freely, Boss? To be honest, I could'nt give a fcuk if every Afghan man, woman and child dropped dead. Our priorities MUST be to protect British soldiers and civlilians.
Here is the mission according to Miliband: “This is a mission that’s been developed with a very clear strategy: above all, to make us safer here because we know these areas of Afghanistan and its neighbour Pakistan are used to launch terrorism around the world. So the mission for us is clear.”
msr

msr

- Posts: 15023
- Joined: Jul 13, 2003
Re: It's poppycock to grow crops here but destroy them in Afghan
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 10:00 am

Ord_Sgt

- Posts: 7588
- Joined: Jul 13, 2003
Re: It's poppycock to grow crops here but destroy them in Af
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 10:03 am
Is that this week's mission? Because the last PROMARK mission statement I saw in very recent times didn't say that.
... and the one I saw 4 weeks ago didn't say that either, and the mission as defined then, had the cube root of SFA to do with "launching terrorism around the world"
When are people going to get it? We have people in some of the most geo-politically important posts in the world today, who are simply not qualified to be there.

PartTimePongo
- Posts: 18594
- Joined: Jul 13, 2003
- Location: Rostov-on-Brum
Re: It's poppycock to grow crops here but destroy them in Af
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 10:04 am
www.usatoday.com/news/...satcov.htm
The United Nations estimates that Afghanistan's opium crop seems to have dropped by more than 90% this year from the nearly 3,300 metric tons produced in 2000.
But
It is a bit strange for Taliban to ban opium cultivation while the drug network is its main source of money.
It's logical. Taliabn needs money to wage the war.
Yes, reportedly there are huge reserves of opium and heroin in Afghanistan.
As we know it hasn't happened and likely would not happen soon. But there is a realistic way to stop opium flaw from Afghanistan eventually - to restore Taliban at power. Why not?

KGB_resident
- Posts: 6895
- Joined: Apr 02, 2005
- Location: Moscow
Re: It's poppycock to grow crops here but destroy them in Afghan
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 10:06 am
Beat me to it.

Werewolf
- Posts: 8515
- Joined: Jul 24, 2005
- Location: Slightly to the Right of Ghenghis Khan...

msr

- Posts: 15023
- Joined: Jul 13, 2003
Re: It's poppycock to grow crops here but destroy them in Afghan
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 10:21 am
There must be plenty of possibilites for improving the area. Let the locals know that if they support/or have dealings with the taliban we'll pull the funding quicker than a quick thing.
To fund it we'll cut the aid we give to India and Africa (India have a space and nuclear programe so why do they need cash? Africa has had long enough to get their sh1t in a sock).
Buy ALL the stock (of poppies) from the farmers at (at least) price and half if not double. We'll need troops on the ground to kep the area safe.
Even if we just tip the sh1t in the sea, it will be better than letting the stuff reach UK.
The crop is used to produce medicinal type stuff. and treatment of smack heads.
Methadone isn't the be all of anti-drugs treatment. It isn't that cheap, nor is it without risks. Some nice clean horse is all they need.
Last edited by chocolate_frog on Mon Jul 13, 2009 10:28 am; edited 1 time in total

chocolate_frog
- Posts: 11490
- Joined: Nov 20, 2004
- Location: Up my own ArRSe
Re: It's poppycock to grow crops here but destroy them in Afghan
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 10:22 am

PartTimePongo
- Posts: 18594
- Joined: Jul 13, 2003
- Location: Rostov-on-Brum
Re: It's poppycock to grow crops here but destroy them in Afghan
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 10:34 am
To be its the sort of plan that a government with balls would instigate. So no chance for a while then.
To me the plan should not be affected too much by what scrotes on the street think/act/behave. This is bigger than that. Over a decade it would bring positive results but would need real conviction.
I for one think, with the limited info I have seen, that it would work. I know a fair bit about the hard drug trade. I even have an adopted brother who sadly got himself on the junk for a while as many orphans do. I've lived in areas with huge hard drug problems. I've even tried to disrupt tha actions of local hard drug dealers. Am not naive about the subject.
I think this has been discussed very open-mindely before and I remember hearing that it would require about £60 million to buy Afghanistan's entire output and that is at street prices so it could be done for far less. Substantially less than our war spending as we then have an asset to sell at profit or at least at cost.
It will be unpopular of course as people while whine on about drug addicts and the state being the biggest drug baron etc etc - but there is a genuine medical need for it and I think controlling the production would work in the long run.
The same could not be done with cocaine though I don't think as its medicinal effects are limited.
Well done MSR for bringing this up again. Bravo.

Mr_Deputy
- Posts: 10510
- Joined: Jul 29, 2005
Re: It's poppycock to grow crops here but destroy them in Af
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 10:39 am

milsum
- Posts: 1685
- Joined: Oct 05, 2006
- Location: missing.
All times are GMT

